No TV licence - anyone else?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Mo1959

Legendary Member
Doesn't Australia & France do this iirc

I think it would be fairer. You're not telling me that thousands, or even tens of thousands of people that are saying they don't need one aren't sneaking a quick watch of something or using vpn,s etc and the rest of us end up paying more each year to cover this.
 

All uphill

Still rolling along
Location
Somerset
I think it would be fairer. You're not telling me that thousands, or even tens of thousands of people that are saying they don't need one aren't sneaking a quick watch of something or using vpn,s etc and the rest of us end up paying more each year to cover this.

Some will be cheating; others, including me, don't even have a TV.

I have no idea of the numbers, do you?
 

Mad Doug Biker

Mediocrity Manifest.
Location
Craggy Island
I think it would be fairer. You're not telling me that thousands, or even tens of thousands of people that are saying they don't need one aren't sneaking a quick watch of something or using vpn,s etc and the rest of us end up paying more each year to cover this.
Oi, I don't, like I say, if you saw my house, you'd understand.

I'm not even sure the telly I had even worked any more anyway!
Some will be cheating; others, including me, don't even have a TV.

I have no idea of the numbers, do you?

Nope, and I doubt there's really any way of knowing.
I thought they had those stupid vehicles... Oh, no... Wait...

It's all...Erm, 'self congratulatory' to put it politely anyway.
 
Last edited:

albion

Legendary Member
Location
Gateshead
No doubt the aim of the Sky Comcast ITV purchase is to bring Comcast style subscriptions to us all.
So £1000+++++ subscriptions for most, not just the current few.

They are certainly betting big on further BBC demise, it being a main stopper of US style bills.
I cannot see how stuff like the world cup can stay affordable/free if the BBC now has to pay an even bigger share to procure even less.
 

Alex321

Guru
Location
South Wales
No doubt the aim of the Sky Comcast ITV purchase is to bring Comcast style subscriptions to us all.
So £1000+++++ subscriptions for most, not just the current few.

I don't think that would be allowed.

The licences for ITV are Public Service Broadcasting licences, which require it to be free to air AIUI.

And while the current licences expire in 2036, I doubt OFCOM is going to give licences without that requirement.
 

albion

Legendary Member
Location
Gateshead
The top ITV productions will likely end up going subscription first. 2034, who knows where things will be.
 

Electric_Andy

Heavy Metal Fan
Location
Plymouth
I think it would be fairer. You're not telling me that thousands, or even tens of thousands of people that are saying they don't need one aren't sneaking a quick watch of something or using vpn,s etc and the rest of us end up paying more each year to cover this.

That's my view as well, we don't watch much but occasionally binge something when there's a new drama out. And there's also a huge number of BBC radio stations that we;ll listen to from time to time, that's all got to be paid for
 

AndyRM

XOXO
Location
North Shields
Nope, and I doubt there's really any way of knowing.

There isn't, but it happens. I use a questionable firestick but I still pay for a TV license. Which might sound daft, but I still believe that for all its flaws, the Beeb is well worth the money.

One thing I've noticed recently both on radio and TV is that they've been thanking license fee payers, which is lovely but also worrying if their funding is knackered, or not in a great state.
 
Top Bottom