earlestownflya
Well-Known Member
- Location
- earlestown.merseyside
that's painfully horrificBeen there... Done that..
![]()
Sorry no idea about the cage... Ask your LBS if not good answers here?
Good luck..!
that's painfully horrificBeen there... Done that..
![]()
Sorry no idea about the cage... Ask your LBS if not good answers here?
Good luck..!
Don't count on it!Wheel was lucky, couple of spokes slightly bent and the wheel only slightly out of true.
Ummm, oh well, it's heading to the lbs this morning and they can have a look and give me a quote, at least it will get fixed properly, and I will have to stomach the expense.
that's painfully horrific
Interestingly it doesn't look like the wheel suffered too much damage? Was a cause pin pointed?I even managed to bent the part of the frame where the hanger goes.. (this was my steel bike)
You should see the face of the guys at the bike shop when I showed up with this one...
Interestingly it doesn't look like the wheel suffered too much damage? Was a cause pin pointed?
It's something I'd just changed, no I don't think it caused the problem, I also don't think incorrect adjustment of the derallier caused the problem, it could be the alignment though and the fact I was big big. It went bang as I changed into the 23 mid way up the hill so yes probably my fault. And yes I'm feeling rather sorry for myself!
I thing the big/big combo under the major stress of a steep climb could be enough to twist the rear mech into touching the spokes, even without an hanger alignment problem, if the limit screw is even slightly out.
What I can't understand is this reluctance to use the small chainring. It must surely be compromising the cyclist's efforts trying to grind up a hill in big/big when easier/more efficient gears are available on the small chainring.
Maybe I'm just being mischievous here; you decide.So in future I must change into the 39 ring? I do TT's and I don't think I've ever changed into the 39, maybe I've twisted it? I didn't think that part of the chain line was under much stress, thought it was above the cogs so to speak?
Seeing as you are being mischievous [not like you at allMaybe I'm just being mischievous here; you decide.
If you're really into TTs, and never use the 39t, why not ditch it and run a single chainring, saving the weight of the unused ring, the FD, the control cable and maybe fit a lighter rear brake lever, as you no longer need the indexed changing mechanism? As a bail-out gear, maybe run a slightly larger top sprocket on the cassette.
i saw the hanger instantly..thats the pain, right there.thats a beautiful frame.....On another point,i build bikes up myself..i've noticed when installing modern larger range cassettes into older steel frames,frames maybe designed for 5,6,7 speed back in the day, that the derailleur runs very close to the spokes when up on the big sprocket.I even managed to bent the part of the frame where the hanger goes.. (this was my steel bike)
You should see the face of the guys at the bike shop when I showed up with this one...
thats why hangers are seperate these days...quick release eh?View attachment 104796
Ok thanks everyone for your opinions, and nice that not everyone is calling me a wally!
My lbs has the bike and is going to fix it in time for my open TT on Saturday, one of the guys working there belongs to my club and does the TT's and I trust them implicitly.
Basically, new rear mech 105 to replace sora, new chain, new cable, wheel truing and maybe a couple of spokes, as my wheels are superstar and run Sapim spokes, this is an easy fix.
They really are are great bunch of guys, chatting this morning it seems it could just be down to the big/ big issue, and changing into the big rear under load half way up a hill as others have suggested, not neccearrilily it being adjusted incorrectly, the hanger calling time got too close to the wheel and boom. Just a particular set of circumstances coming together at the same time.
Everyone I have spoken to regarding this never change into the little ring on the front during TT's!
It's my only bike so I use it for recreational use, training and racing so I don't think I could be without the 39 ring @Poacher.
Like I said the lbs will be in touch when it's done, nothing was too much trouble for them, top service.
Some pics
View attachment 104792
View attachment 104793
View attachment 104794
View attachment 104795