Rider Safety - time to act?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
Flying_Monkey

Flying_Monkey

Recyclist
Location
Odawa
Although it does mean we're now discussing the same thing in two separate threads...

What I was hoping for was to extend the conversation, so as not to forget that it isn't just about Brazil or this particular course, particularly as some of the obejctions to any description of the Olympics course as dangerous were to say 'well, it's no more dangerous than Race X'.

Plus this thread was here first. :tongue:
 
<digging up this ancient thread to highlight how long this discussion has been ongoing!?>

Giro Stage2 crash (2026):
Several UAE riders DNF after fast-ish downhill crash into armco.
captura-de-ecra-2026-05-09-151827-69ff428079a7c.jpg

A few days later, accusations (which are not denied) emerge that UAE were racing on TT tyres.
To me this is a reminder that no matter how much UCI mess-up on safety, or how much they improve safety, riders and teams will always prefer to take risks if it gives a competitive advantage.

https://cyclinguptodate.com/cycling...attribute-uaes-mass-crash-to-poor-tyre-choice

On the Watts Occuring podcast, Netcompany INEOS director of racing and Decathlon CMA CGM Team DS Luke Rowe believe that the crash may have been due to UAE's selection of tyres for the day: the Continental's GP 5000 TT tyres. These are time trial specific tyres, which the team often uses in regular road races. A legal choice, but a risky one for rainy days, as the tyres have less traction.
"UAE were riding TT tyres. We all know they're faster. They are faster. They always use them," Rowe said. "They're the one team who use them under almost any circumstances. But they do have less grip. And the first guy down was a UAE guy. Lost both wheels."
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
<digging up this ancient thread to highlight how long this discussion has been ongoing!?>

Giro Stage2 crash (2026):
Several UAE riders DNF after fast-ish downhill crash into armco.
View attachment 808312
A few days later, accusations (which are not denied) emerge that UAE were racing on TT tyres.
To me this is a reminder that no matter how much UCI mess-up on safety, or how much they improve safety, riders and teams will always prefer to take risks if it gives a competitive advantage.

https://cyclinguptodate.com/cycling...attribute-uaes-mass-crash-to-poor-tyre-choice

On the Watts Occuring podcast, Netcompany INEOS director of racing and Decathlon CMA CGM Team DS Luke Rowe believe that the crash may have been due to UAE's selection of tyres for the day: the Continental's GP 5000 TT tyres. These are time trial specific tyres, which the team often uses in regular road races. A legal choice, but a risky one for rainy days, as the tyres have less traction.
"UAE were riding TT tyres. We all know they're faster. They are faster. They always use them," Rowe said. "They're the one team who use them under almost any circumstances. But they do have less grip. And the first guy down was a UAE guy. Lost both wheels."

Same wet grip as Gatorskin Hardshells. Hope no one was racing on those as well.

IMG_2209.jpeg


IMG_2210.jpeg
 

TakeTheHighRoad

Well-Known Member
Seems an apt place to put this, as I was reflecting on the stage finish yesterday whilst on the way to work today.

We all accept that a turn on cobbles with 400m to go in the rain wasn't a great idea, but I feel as though a lot of blame has been put on the organisers in hindsight.

As with the tyre choice made above, the riders have to respond to the conditions, and the bend wasn't in and of itself dangerous. Davide Ballerini and Jasper Stuyven got round with no issues, but they chose to take a tighter line than the Unibet riders (Reinders and Groenewegen)

In my opinion, the organisers are bound by the contract with Napoli, and that presumably entails finishing a stage where the City council want them to, but I think were very unfortunate that the rain fell precisely 5 minutes before the riders got to that point.

There were complaints about the safety of the straight finish at Poland because it was too fast, complaints about the finish in Sofia as there was a corner with 300m to go, and complaints about all manner of finishes. But I think the riders tend to get away scot-free in situations like this, as if they have no say in how a course is raced
 
In my opinion, the organisers are bound by the contract with Napoli, and that presumably entails finishing a stage where the City council want them to, but I think were very unfortunate that the rain fell precisely 5 minutes before the riders got to that point.

IMHO the Naples finish was not a major risk to the riders. YES the falls were unsurprising, but they were at walking pace - far preferable to a 45-60kph stack. Ideally they would have found a long straight without cobbles, so yes, not an ideal finish, but really this was a bit of an oddity.
I'd love to know more about the contractual issues, good point!
 

mididoctors

Über Member
IMHO the Naples finish was not a major risk to the riders. YES the falls were unsurprising, but they were at walking pace - far preferable to a 45-60kph stack. Ideally they would have found a long straight without cobbles, so yes, not an ideal finish, but really this was a bit of an oddity.
I'd love to know more about the contractual issues, good point!

I agree with a lot of this ....that said wet cobbles 180⁰ 400m from the line on stage where the sprint trains will hit it first is stupid.


On what makes crashes deadly it's speed . The high speed crashes kill . Technical descent may cause a crash or two but it was straighter downhills that killed Gino and wout
 
Top Bottom