Drago
Legendary Member
- Location
- Suburban Poshshire
YukonBoy is correct. The greater efficiency of a cyclists lungs offsets the intake of fumes somewhar. As a result, lazy fatsos in cars suffer more detriment from traffic fumes than cyclists do,
Correct. Got my missus to ride my other road bike last year and she couldnt believe how nice it was to ride. Only bikes she had ridden before were cheap heavy mountain bikes. Its a pity that its only cheap crap that is accessible to many, heavy and hard to ride and put people off cycling. If decent bikes were not so ridiculously espensive then more people would stick with cycling.Think a lot of folk haven't cycled since they were kids themselves and then only went round the block or half a mile to the park etc on old rusting choppers or grifters with the tyres half pumped up. If they rode a 500 quid bike for example these days they may be surprised just how effortless it can be and enjoyable.
Its a pity that its only cheap crap that is accessible to many, heavy and hard to ride and put people off cycling. If decent bikes were not so ridiculously espensive then more people would stick with cycling.
I'm new to forum so apologies if this covered somewhere. I've ridden bikes for years as daily transport, I've had cars but always had bikes. I am still amazed at work colleagues reactions when I rock up in all weather. They all live less than five miles from work and drive in. They all think I'm nuts that I ride for fun, shopping, commuting and holidays. I never wear special clothing, helmets which baffles them as well. Many have health conditions linked to lack of any meaningful exercise but don't appear to link exercise to health! I am older than the majority as well. Not a zealot about cycling its just the most practical way to get about and notice your community and the world in general.
What's happened in recent years is the really low end stuff has got both much cheaper in real terms, and is of shoddier quality.
My Apollo MTB is at least 25 years old, and I've put hundreds and hundreds of miles on it with only a front tyre change. The back tyre was quite new.
What do you mean quality 'may not be to your liking'? Cheap crap is cheap crap and i dont care if bikes that dont fall apart after a few months and are like cycling a jcb have always been expensive. The fact is they shouldnt be so expensive as most are mass produced cheaply in the far east. A lot of these low end bikes shouldnt even be sold imo, i have tried a few and they fall apart within months if used daily, costs more to maintain them than the price they cost.Decent lightweight machines have always been expensive to buy new, that is no different. Good quality heavyweight bikes never used to be throwaway cheap either. What's happened in recent years is the really low end stuff has got both much cheaper in real terms, and is of shoddier quality. Cycling is more financially accessible at the bottom end than ever before. The quality of the product may not be to your liking, but large numbers of riders, in fact I'd say the majority, are doing their cycling riding "cheap crap" bikes.
Rohloff well worth the extra on a secondhand bike.What do you mean quality 'may not be to your liking'? Cheap crap is cheap crap and i dont care if bikes that dont fall apart after a few months and are like cycling a jcb have always been expensive. The fact is they shouldnt be so expensive as most are mass produced cheaply in the far east. A lot of these low end bikes shouldnt even be sold imo, i have tried a few and they fall apart within months if used daily, costs more to maintain them than the price they cost.
Dry wheel bearings and missing brake pads can actually kill people. The low end bikes on the market are built for an annual summer ride down the local bike path and that's about it.Cheap crap is cheap crap. A lot of these low end bikes shouldn't even be sold imo.