How I pine for the days when people appreciated my humour, given alder effort I put into not just serving up hoary old chestnuts.
Opps I missed that.
How I pine for the days when people appreciated my humour, given alder effort I put into not just serving up hoary old chestnuts.
How I pine for the days when people appreciated my humour, given alder effort I put into not just serving up hoary old chestnuts.
Oakay oakay.
Holly the puns, Batman!
Stop rooting for more and just leaf it at that!
If you lot don’t stop these puns, I MAPLE the plug on this whole thread.
Well that's made it plane to us, but I'm not sure that wood be poplar.
Stop rooting for more and just leaf it at that!
If you lot don’t stop these puns, I MAPLE the plug on this whole thread.
Don't get too wound up. After all, it's no big deal.
read the articles..... yes they are both saying I didn't do it it was him. And each defence lawyer will say if to the jury "if you arent sure it was him the you can't find him guilty" its the trying to create to reasonable doubt defence. If they don;t blame each other then they are both likely to get convicted as acting in collusion, which is the argument of the prosecution barrister - "you planned and did it together, one of you sawed it down whilst the other filmed it."
Its hard to see them being found not guilty tbh.
Both Guilty - unanimous verdict.
take them down! - well sentencing will be later.....