Wasn't there that study saying 15% or so RLJ in London?
How do you know this? I've scraped enough corpses off the Tarmac across the tears, conducted the investigations, and completed the official paperwork from which the Home Office will compile their road death figures, and there ain't not ticky box for RLJ'ing.TfL did a study and came up with a figure of 18% of cyclists RLJ in London. Which is round about the same percentage of drivers that RLJ more than three seconds after the light has gone red. Its also not a particularly dangerous thing to do - the number of cyclist deaths from RLJing are very low compared to the prevalence of RLJing.
Well they weren't studying properly then.
You now cycle commute in London.
Do you agree with that figure?
How do you know this? I've scraped enough corpses off the Tarmac across the tears, conducted the investigations, and completed the official paperwork from which the Home Office will compile their road death figures, and there ain't not ticky box for RLJ'ing.
Well they weren't studying properly then.
You now cycle commute in London.
Do you agree with that figure?
TfL did a study and came up with a figure of 18% of cyclists RLJ in London. Which is round about the same percentage of drivers that RLJ more than three seconds after the light has gone red. Its also not a particularly dangerous thing to do - the number of cyclist deaths from RLJing are very low compared to the prevalence of RLJing.
It certainly happens a lot, but I've never measured it.
I'd certainly not dismiss a proper study of anything over my anecdotal experience though, especially when it comes from a source I'd normally consider to be somewhat biased against cyclists.
Yes thank you for that.
I think my experience of cycle commuting in London every day of the week for the last 7 years says a lot more then that report.
If it's so safe to jump red lights, why not ditch them altogether? or pass a law to say cyclist's don't have to stop at red lights?