Just trying to save you having to ask the question againwhy is it for my benefit dan ? Whats your point ?
Just trying to save you having to ask the question againwhy is it for my benefit dan ? Whats your point ?
Do you think the rider should have been dodging in and out of the gaps between the parked cars or that he should have been riding closer to the parked cars, or maybe a little of both?That road looks big enough for a safe overtake if both parties played ball, clearly the cyclist chose not too. He was looking for confrontation, could have and should have let the mpv safely pass him.
If thats six inches then the cyclist is five feet from his nearside (excessive). The road looks wide enough to accommodate both vehicles
That road looks big enough for a safe overtake if both parties played ball
yeah, never seen a 5 foot car door but just in case Im going to choose to be a bit of an arse and get some mileage out of my multiple camera set up...
All the posters saying that the cyclist should have done nothing do any of you think it's ever acceptable to approach a motorist whose driving you feel was well below par and if you do when is that?
If you go looking for confrontation, rightly or wrongly, you will meet somebody willing to give it out.
He was lucky to get a tarmac diver, it could have easily been somebody with a knife. He has a camera, he has it on film, he wasn't touched. If he genuinely felt like his safety was at risk by the pass, he could quite easily pass the details and evidence onto the police.
If somebody passes you a bit close in a car, do you park next to them, and tell them how stupid they were? I reckon most of the time, people that make a mistake will apologise, but those making a stupid pass like that, aren't likely to give you a nice heartly apology.
He could, but it is likely that the police would do nothing. It is this perceived lack of accountability, enforcement and justice for careless and dangerous driving that cultivates the burgeoning camera and YouTube phenomenon. Social media retribution/justice fills the void for some people (nearly 2 million hits on YouTube for this video alone).
Is this online ridicule more or less effective than a talking to by a police officer for the poor overtake - I don't really know...but with no guarantee of even low-level police action, I can understand why people resort to a 21st century version of the stocks.
He could, but it is likely that the police would do nothing. It is this perceived lack of accountability, enforcement and justice for careless and dangerous driving that cultivates the burgeoning camera and YouTube phenomenon. Social media retribution/justice fills the void for some people (nearly 2 million hits on YouTube for this video alone).
Is this online ridicule more or less effective than a talking to by a police officer for the poor overtake - I don't really know...but with no guarantee of even low-level police action, I can understand why people resort to a 21st century version of the stocks.
It's like poking an angry dog
No - it's like resisting being bullied by another person.
Do we really expect the police to act on a close pass? Assuming this would fall under careless / dangerous driving, could that even be proved based on the video evidence available? Seems like a monumental waste of time and resources.