Rod Hull - another olde mane who deserves our helpe...

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Luddite Joe

Über Member
Location
Swindon
[QUOTE 3202024, member: 259"]I though that was swans? Wouldn't an emu be more likely to just disembowel him?[/QUOTE]

You're more likely to be disembowelled by the House Builders Federation as far as I can tell.
 

Mugshot

Cracking a solo.
Looks like he's found something else to do with his time
Keith Harris.jpg
 

classic33

Leg End Member
You can escape an Emu attack by lying down on the ground. Their razor sharp claws can't disembowel you then because their knee joints don't bend that way. At least that's true for ostriches, maybe emus are different.
"Play dead. In a 1918 article in The Atlantic magazine, former President Theodore Roosevelt wrote, "If, when assailed by the ostrich, the man stands erect, he is in great danger. But by the simple expedient of lying down, he escapes all danger." The experience of ostrich farmers, naturalists, and adventurers has largely confirmed Roosevelt's observation. Since ostriches kick forward and downward, the chance of injury is much lower if you lie face down on the ground and cover your head and neck with your arms. Your back will still be exposed, but this is much safer than if your front were open to attack. Additionally, the ostrich is not able to kick very effectively at an object on the ground, and eventually it will lose interest if you play dead. The bird will still likely stand on you--it's been described as dancing by some who've gone through the experience--and it may even sit on you for a while, but it will most likely not rip you open if you do this equivalent of burying your head in the sand."
 

KneesUp

Guru
"Play dead. In a 1918 article in The Atlantic magazine, former President Theodore Roosevelt wrote, "If, when assailed by the ostrich, the man stands erect, he is in great danger. But by the simple expedient of lying down, he escapes all danger." The experience of ostrich farmers, naturalists, and adventurers has largely confirmed Roosevelt's observation. Since ostriches kick forward and downward, the chance of injury is much lower if you lie face down on the ground and cover your head and neck with your arms. Your back will still be exposed, but this is much safer than if your front were open to attack. Additionally, the ostrich is not able to kick very effectively at an object on the ground, and eventually it will lose interest if you play dead. The bird will still likely stand on you--it's been described as dancing by some who've gone through the experience--and it may even sit on you for a while, but it will most likely not rip you open if you do this equivalent of burying your head in the sand."
You can try it if you like. Being an all-action adventure hero I think I'd jump on it's back and ride it to the next town before throttling it and eating it.
 

classic33

Leg End Member
You can try it if you like. Being an all-action adventure hero I think I'd jump on it's back and ride it to the next town before throttling it and eating it.
Last ostrich farm near me closed when they were set free to run wild. Not certain how many survive today though
 

Ajay

Veteran
Location
Lancaster
Be afraid, be very afraid...
 

Attachments

  • 550w_dsicons_grotbags_3.jpg
    550w_dsicons_grotbags_3.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 15

KneesUp

Guru
I can't believe for one minute that Keith Harris made seven million quid from that feckin stupid green bird puppet.



Now, at best that looks more like a seven quid act and even that's pushing it.

He says in the article that one contract he signed meant that his agent took 25% - and it implies that was the worst one. So by my calculations he's had at least 75% of £7 million, or as I call it, over five million quid for a rubbish act with an irritating duck. If he's spent that, that's his own business, surely?
 

threebikesmcginty

Corn Fed Hick...
Location
...on the slake
He says in the article that one contract he signed meant that his agent took 25% - and it implies that was the worst one. So by my calculations he's had at least 75% of £7 million, or as I call it, over five million quid for a rubbish act with an irritating duck. If he's spent that, that's his own business, surely?

Looking at the original photo, he sure ain't spent it on quality home furnishings.
 

KneesUp

Guru
Looking at the original photo, he sure ain't spent it on quality home furnishings.

I hadn't noticed that. It's the sort of chair you would imagine would only have been bought by Michael Jackson on one of his "I'll take the whole store" shopping trips in Las Vegas.
 
Top Bottom