Interesting differences of opinions there. My son and his wife, the parents of Eddy have both said that they DON'T want the dog to be put down. They both know the dog and have only seen the evidence of his actions. My wife though is adamant the dog should be destroyed as she witnessed the malicious destruction on the beautiful face of a defenceless baby. I could go either way. I reacted fastest of all - as described to me in minute detail by my wife - and she reckons that saved him from more damage as I dragged him off by his collar and threw him in the garden before he savaged Eddy even more while she admits she wouldn't have known what to do. Even the psychological excuses for the dog's actions though count for little when compared to the terrifying assault on a poor little baby who'd done no harm whatsoever to the dog.
Nobody "knows" the dog, they can't have a rational discussion with it, the dog acted on instinct and it is still around to do so again, it shouldn't be IMO. It could be the park or anywhere next time, it's just not a risk worth taking, is it?
Last edited: