thegrumpybiker
New Member
- Location
- North London
...I applaud heartily.
J4CKO said:Yes, most of the time thats how I work, however I don't see where mutual respect has been shown here, contempt, cruelty, endangerment, aggression etc but Garilla was not offered a basic level of respect, treated as a play thing by idiots who were hoping to see him injured or at least scared, difficult to respect them, he reacted and then came off worse.
You get your own back in your own way with your videos and there are many different options to pursue before I get to the stage of damaging something or somebody but when you have taken a battering for no reason other than having a nice car (which also came in for some stick) then you do want to get some revenge, their car was worthless anyway.
The reason idiots like this behave as they do, they see cyclists as a soft touch, which we are generally, sometimes thinking their could be ramifications might help.
I know you arent going to agree with me, thats fine.
I pushed a wing mirror backwards on a car last night, no damage, it was totally blocking the pavement on a blind bend, just happened to catch it with my hip.
magnatom said:I was just pointing out that doing damage to someone else's property serves absolutely no purpose other than satisfying your own lust for revenge. I'm not having a go personally, but I just can condone that type of retribution. In my opinion (and I have been know to voice it occasionally) by taking revenge you lower yourself to the level of the ned/chav/Scally/whatever. You also open yourself up to the risks of getting caught etc.
Not scallywag then?Crackle said:Fixed.
magnatom said:Not scallywag then?
magnatom said:Ah. I am now an ED and not a NED!
Twenty Inch said:Oh well, at least I had the front (as Garilla did) to get physically involved, instead of winding people up through the safety of the internet. Now where's that ignore list?
BentMikey said:Careful, you're not that different from Lee. You're both dirty rotten RLJers after all.
...and Lee is a decent chap and a pretty good rider in real life. Perhaps his comments were painfully harsh here, but he does have a fair point.
magnatom said:I was just pointing out that doing damage to someone else's property serves absolutely no purpose other than satisfying your own lust for revenge. I'm not having a go personally, but I just can condone that type of retribution. In my opinion (and I have been know to voice it occasionally) by taking revenge you lower yourself to the level of the ned/chav/whatever. You also open yourself up to the risks of getting caught etc.
garrilla said:There were many moments during this event where I or the occupants of the car could have made alternative decisions and events could have turned out differently.
Beyond the initial act of dangerous stupidity, the most significant moment, from my perspective, was when I arrived at their car and attempted to engage with them to let them know how stupid their stunt was and how angry this had made me. This was an opportunity for them to apologise for their 'mistake' - to tell me 'they were just having a laugh.' But the didn't they sat nonchalantly laughing from the protection of their car. This rendered me powerless, amplified the anger and I lashed out. My mistake.
I'm in my mid 40s and I've done nothing like this. But its not the first time that a car driver and/or passengers have saw fit to involve themselves, unwarranted, in my cycling journey. Sadly, I don't suppose it will be the last.