I'm afraid I have to agree. 1, 2 and 4 looked like nothing really. Assuming you were indicating left, then 3 was a bit of an ignorant so and so. 5 was closer than they should have been, but not so bad I would have posted it. 6 is always an awkward situation, but is really 50:50. 7 - I've given up bothering with these unless they actually do something that affects me directly.
1, 2, 4 and 5 were all (at least almost) within arm's reach. I was indicating left on 3 (just before the RM van sped up). The camera's highly misleading.
Have you just got the camera? Did a 16 mile quick training ride tonight and loads worse than those, chill out, they did little wrong.
I have just got the camera, but, again, it's misleading (rather than me being upload happy). I used to have an Muvi clone and today's a first for the amount of videos I've uploaded.
Yep really sorry but I have to agree with 400bhp. The close passes weren't that close. The "must pass cyclist", you were quite a way from the red light, I count a "must pass cyclist" as one where they brake as soon as they are in front of you.
It's less the must pass I'm fussed about. It's more him being in the ASZ (presumably to stop me using it) than not concentrating on the road. It's not so clear on the video but he was looking down in the passenger footwell for some reason.
The inside overtake was largely due to your road positioning. Either you accept these or you close the gap after the post office van by indicating you're pulling back into the lane and taking your position when safe to do so.
I was indicating. Go and watch the video again and you'll see that it wasn't safe to pull in, as the tosser accelerated to stop me getting in (why, is still beyond me).
It's less about how bad the cockups are, more about how many of them there were in a 10 mile commute (3 of which on the same bit of road).