You come barely any distance from the elbow of the outside cyclist!
Evidently, the motorist in the OP was overtaking on a corner.I think we all agree the motorist was at fault...end of
The two abreast issue is simply a matter of consideration and timing. Two abreast on a bend on a road with a 60 mph limit ....cant condone it....sure, taking the primary on the approach to the bend ( as mentioned by mugshot ) is something I do all of the time (today even - fast country road ) but effectively blocking the lane completely..nah ..... thats a recipe for disaster. If its not within the drivers limit point on approach then anything could happen and the motorist wouldnt reasonably be expected to be at fault.
I doubt that scenario adequately reflects that of the OP......
It's unlikely they'll be taking up more room than a tractor or a road sweeper, and quite possibly traveling more quickly, I wonder if the driver would have overtaken something like that on a blind bend.
![]()
What's the difference?
If it's two lanes they move into the other lane. If it's less then the cyclist/s need to try to control the overtake until they are comfortable that the overtake will be performed safely.Driver shouldn't have been overtaking anyone on a blind bend, this has been agreed by literally every single person here.
But it's true more a lot more idiotic decisions are made around cyclists than tractors. Having said that, I've seen many a horrific overtake with farm traffic!
In your diagram clearly none, but the width of the roads and the position of the cyclists in your picture has them all bunched over and the road nice and wide. A situation which I have to say I rarely see replicated on quite narrow country lanes. It is also true that the cyclists are much closer to the car in the second picture, doesn't take too much imagination to see that a narrower lane and a more primarily positioned cyclist can actually preclude somebody from giving them much space. I could re-draw the scenario myself, if it helped, but I don't have an imaging programme on my laptop.
In my experience horses and their riders get far more room, respect, patience than cyclists. How was that achieved?Which leads to the interesting questions. Is is our responsibility to manage their decisions? If so how?
Evidently, the motorist in the OP was overtaking on a corner.
I honestly get where you're coming from, the image of two abreast cycling can very easily conjure up the impression that the road is being blocked, that the cyclists are inconsiderate, that they are deliberately holding up the flow of traffic. However it is in the majority of cases quite simply wrong, as a vulnerable road user you should be overtaken with as much room as it is possible to give, I know that doesn't necessarily happen but it should. In riding two abreast you should still expect to be given as much room as possible, for the motorist the overtake would and should be identical, they move over as far as they are safely able to and overtake when the road is clear, there does not need to be any difference in the manoeuvre.
There is no reason to kowtow and tug the forelock because some motorist, and unfortunately some cyclists, cannot see that lone riding or two abreast riding frequently makes no difference at all.
Driving too fast for the conditions. What would you have done if the cyclists were on your side of road and car was coming other direction? Hit them ?
If it's two lanes they move into the other lane. If it's less then the cyclist/s need to try to control the overtake until they are comfortable that the overtake will be performed safely.
In my opinion you are inviting close overtakes in one of the worst positions to get a close overtake, if a car comes round the bend in the opposite direction the most likely thing for the overtaking driver to do is to turn straight back in to you.I will take primary when I can on approach to a bend and get my sorry ass in as far as reasonable when im negotiating it.
I've not felt comfortable to overtake them.
It's still not inconsiderate by the cyclists though, there is room to overtake so they are not restricting the flow of traffic. The driver is giving as much room as possible, and one would hope they are travelling at an appropriate speed, I can see no issues.Scrap that, I do have some imaging software...
![]()
I would say this more accurately mimics the scenarios I have been in when I've been driving somewhere rather than on a bike, and I've not felt comfortable to overtake them. I know how horrible it is to be passed so close, and tbh I wouldn't feel safe.
If they're taking the lane for safety reasons, 100% fair enough, but I have to say that is not always the case. Plenty of people go around cycling in pairs on perfectly safe and highly visible straight segments of road. I mean... I have encountered them!
Anyway, I'm not even really sure why I'm still posting... just wanted to demonstrate exactly what I'm on about I guess!
In my opinion you are inviting close overtakes in one of the worst positions to get a close overtake, if a car comes round the bend in the opposite direction the most likely thing for the overtaking driver to do is to turn straight back in to you.
![]()
What's the difference?