Snapped spindle

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
The HollowTech 2 spindle diameter is 24 mm.

Whilst you managed to get that bit right, you got the inner radius incorrect. Hollowtech steel spindles are 3mm thick. Thus the outer radius is 12mm, and inner radius 9mm. Putting real world figures in the calculator, even Olympic Gold medallist torque, you are not going to reach the shear yield point by a factor over 3. A good safety margin.

1770281591708.png
 
OP
OP
R

roubaixtuesday

self serving virtue signaller
Whilst you managed to get that bit right, you got the inner radius incorrect. Hollowtech steel spindles are 3mm thick. Thus the outer radius is 12mm, and inner radius 9mm. Putting real world figures in the calculator, even Olympic Gold medallist torque, you are not going to reach the shear yield point by a factor over 3. A good safety margin.

View attachment 799439

Just out of interest, how much does the safety factor improve if the shaft were solid? The hollow shaft with 3mm is only 44% of the weight of a solid shaft. I doubt the strength improves by very much by filling in the centre, but I don't recall the relevant formulae and am far to lazy to look them up.
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
Just out of interest, how much does the safety factor improve if the shaft were solid? The hollow shaft with 3mm is only 44% of the weight of a solid shaft. I doubt the strength improves by very much by filling in the centre, but I don't recall the relevant formulae and am far to lazy to look them up.

A solid shaft of the hollowtech outer diameter has a safety margin of about 4.5 for an Olympic track cyclist.

1770283586007.png


For us mere mortals in everyday use, the hollow axle far exceeds that safety margin. A safety fsctor of about 9 for a mortals very short sprint.

1770284026887.png
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
R

roubaixtuesday

self serving virtue signaller
Thanks!

So making it solid would give a a weight increase of ~2.5x for a strength increase of ~1.5x.

Back on the subject of ducks, birds are designed like hollowtech axles. It turns out that some diving ducks are however an exception to the rule that birds have hollow bones, which are assumed to be a modification to reduce weight for flight. The more time spent diving, the less likely to have air filled bones.

One example is the Long-tailed Duck — the deepest diving sea duck — which they found to have thick, marrow-filled bones. This trend is observed amongst many aquatic diving birds because it gives them extra weight to counteract their buoyancy in water, which requires even more energy for diving. In contrast, they found that other ducks, like the Eurasian Teal (a dabbling duck that spends most of its life in the shallows and doesn’t submerge its entire body underwater) have almost entirely air-filled humeri.

https://www.esc.cam.ac.uk/news/some-birds-have-hollow-bones-and-new-research-helps-us-understand-why
 
Location
Loch side.
But but but...what about Olympian Teals? Safety margin?
 

silva

Über Member
Location
Belgium
Whilst you managed to get that bit right, you got the inner radius incorrect. Hollowtech steel spindles are 3mm thick. Thus the outer radius is 12mm, and inner radius 9mm. Putting real world figures in the calculator, even Olympic Gold medallist torque, you are not going to reach the shear yield point by a factor over 3. A good safety margin.

View attachment 799439
I was unable to find the inner diameter specification, so I used example cases of 2 (first example) and 1 mm (second example).
Both (of course since percentuages don't change with absolutes, something you ignore(d)) example cases resulted in a 29% better resistence to snap.

Here you make that same "argument", as back then Yellow Saddle did with "Minimal" and "Maximal": a "Good" safety margin.
I then said let's put figures on it, resulting in a 29% better snap resistence, which is Faaaaaaar From Minimal.

This topics declared-as fact is: HollowTech 2 spindles DO snap.
That means that what you here claim as "Good" safety margin was NOT Good ENUF, Nuff' said.

Note again that all I say here is a repeat.
 

silva

Über Member
Location
Belgium
Hollowduck II for the win
For the Win? :smile:
Who did you beat, the Lizards aLong the way?
You Limped Thankfully 3 Flat Miles Home on 1 Leg:
Shouldn't have had that extra portion of spinach for lunch...

Going up the last little rise, out of the saddle, and CLUNK!!!! Drive train seized completely, stopped for an inspection. Became apparent that the non drive side crank was wobbling, but drive side was firmish. I assumed the spindle had cracked and limped the three thankfully flat miles home one legged but still riding.

Sure enough:
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
R

roubaixtuesday

self serving virtue signaller
A solid shaft of the hollowtech outer diameter has a safety margin of about 4.5 for an Olympic track cyclist.

View attachment 799444

For us mere mortals in everyday use, the hollow axle far exceeds that safety margin. A safety fsctor of about 9 for a mortals very short sprint.

View attachment 799445

Another cheeky and lazy question: any idea what the equivalent calc for a solid square taper is?
 
Top Bottom