Trust me, not so much as a grain of salt.
Indeed, it might cause the stainless steel to stain.
Trust me, not so much as a grain of salt.
I don't have any opinion on the other aspects of Hollowtech but it's just as DIY friendly as square taper. Maybe even a little easier. And like square taper requires only one special tool., cheapo and more robust/sealed>reliable square taper had stayed the mass' norm, and allow DIY (just a crank puller as special tool),
Hollowtech 2 has its bearings external - left and right OUTside the bottom bracket, so not protected by it, more exposed to dirt and water, whereas in the simple and durable square taper case, they sit INside. I'm sure you know so why ask?How are the bearings more exposed? The only way water or grit can get in is past the seals on the spindle, which are in the same place as on square taper BB's. In fact you could argue they are more secure in that respect because being further outboard they are less in the way of spray from the front tyre.
Hollowtech 2 has its bearings external - left and right OUTside the bottom bracket, so not protected by it, more exposed to dirt and water, whereas in the simple and durable square taper case, they sit INside. I'm sure you know so why ask?
This is even regardless seals. The bearings have additional protection.
Also about this specific: a crank puller does the job on any square taper, regardless brand and its model, unlike the hollow axle market.I don't have any opinion on the other aspects of Hollowtech but it's just as DIY friendly as square taper. Maybe even a little easier. And like square taper requires only one special tool.
I speak as a completely cack handed home mechanic who is allergic to complicated jobs. I've replaced cranksets with outboard BBs (both SRAM Apex and Shimano 105) with little fuss. And square taper too (cartridge and loose bearings).
You flag seals as "good" or "not good", with nothing inbetween, as in a digital binary fashion, but seals are degraded by contaminants and wear, and their lifetime shrinks with more of it, requiring more disassembly, replacements, that is. work and cost.I don't understand that. Ingress to the bearings is only via the seals(or, theoretically, down the seat tube I suppose). Surely it doesn't matter if they are internal or external. If the seals are good, they are protected. If they aren't, they aren't.
He would have been replying to your unedited post, you realise that?You flag seals as "good" or "not good", with nothing inbetween, as in a digital binary fashion, but seals are degraded by contaminants and wear, and their lifetime shrinks with more of it, requiring more disassembly, replacements, that is. work and cost.
Ingress to bearings is just what follows up ingress to sealings so why threating both separately?
I didn't say water flowing down the seat tube, I said water flowing down the raincoat of the rider, wherever that hangs over, and bearings (or their sealings...) at the sides of the bottom bracket instead of inside it, receive a nice constant douche.
Also about this specific: a crank puller does the job on any square taper, regardless brand and its model, unlike the hollow axle market.
Indeed.. the only factor governing the ID appears to be how thin Shimano think they can go on the wall thickness to save mass; which of course is a large selling point of the design.If an axles design is up to the task then breaks should have clear external causes like overloaded, pothole, so on. But the load here comes from a human leg...
The torsion deformation is a function of outer and inner diameters of the shaft ( thickness wall). The outer is bound within dimensions for compatibility with other parts, but is there any limitation for the inner?
Indeed.. the only factor governing the ID appears to be how thin Shimano think they can go on the wall thickness to save mass; which of course is a large selling point of the design.
Safety critical parts like this shouldn't "just fail" in normal use without some exacerbating factor like mechanical damage or corrosion.
Personally I'd take the penelty of a few extra grams for a thicker wall if it removed the possibility of breakages like this.
On the commute
https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/tales-from-todays-commute.105055/post-7567940
I'm sure I saw someone else post one recently.
It's been on since the bike was new, 10 years and at a guess 40,000 plus miles but still a bit of a surprise.
They don't make them any more I think (5800) but surprisingly managed to score one off Ebay for a princely £80 and even in silver and 175 length (Yes, it's silver under the commuting crud).
Probably worth getting a new BB too I guess, and will replace chain and cassette too, which ideally I'd have waited until vernal equinox for.
View attachment 798388
Dont feed the animals people. Don't, they will just come back again and again.
Also about this specific: a crank puller does the job on any square taper, regardless brand and its model, unlike the hollow axle market.