figbat
Former slippery scientist
- Location
- South Oxfordshire, UK
Well he made a meal of it but got there in the end. Judd just didn’t seem to be all there, despite the heroic fightback.
Not sure controversy is the word, just incredible sportsmanship and fair mindedness. Agree the ref was correct though. He should have invited Selby to look at it with the other ball in position.
Remarkable sportsmanship by Selby. Trump on the other hand, unless something has been said behind the scenes that we don’t know about, has appeared to get away scot free with refusing to accept a referee’s decision, a decision that by general consensus was the correct one. Of course he was entitled to ask the ref to check it, which he did, and he may of course have eventually accepted the referee’s decision, that we will never know, but he didn’t seem to be ready to accept it.
I’m still not convinced it was the right decision; there really ought to be better technology available to assess these close calls. But even so, the ref relented when Selby said he could see it all; so that was two professional players at the highest level agreeing that they could see the whole ball.
Placing extra balls to make a visual assessment is fraught with errors - the extra balls weren’t actually touching the balls in play, the incident angles have to be precisely perpendicular, and so on.
Pros will also slightly swerve the ball to create an angle, so they both thought they could hit the ball, and I don’t doubt them, but they would have probably bent the cue ball a little to avoid the yellow.
As I said up thread a basic laser pen would solve this.