NegativeFor those that cycle on the roads. Would you use a cycle lane that ran down the center of the road, four lanes wide, just to access the ASL.
You've two lanes on either side which see heavy use from lorries.
I'd have to see it to be sure, but almost certainly not.For those that cycle on the roads. Would you use a cycle lane that ran down the center of the road, four lanes wide, just to access the ASL.
You've two lanes on either side which see heavy use from lorries.
There’s a nasty little thing like that which I made the mistake of using, a couple of months ago, in London. I got hit from behind as I got to the ASL, not great.
Like that, but mandatory.
Just past Parson’s green as you’re heading towards the bottom of the Kings road. I’m fairly sure there’s a couple out towards Barnes Common too.Where?
This is the opposite view, the white van is turning left, I see cyclists getting pinched at this point regularly the tin boxes are expecting them to also turn left not go straight forward.
Left turning cyclist use the separated path, straight on and right use the highly vunerbale likely to be left hooked lane, is what I infer from that.Its not very straight forward as the direction is telling cyclists to get on the pavement.
Its not very straight forward as the direction is telling cyclists to get on the pavement.
Yes that's what happens I suspect that the drivers don't see the sign for any left turning cyclist should use the path, so they start to overtake the cyclist then veer left & are amazed the cyclist is still thereLeft turning cyclist use the separated path, straight on and right use the highly vunerbale likely to be left hooked lane, is what I infer from that.