The Ashes

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
I was all for dropping Cook before the first test in Australia in the last series over there.(2010). I think he ended up with an average over 100 and 3 centuries!:blush:
 

Maz

Guru
You should know, Maz, that they can't!

Hook, line, set and match to AP! ;)
:banghead:
 

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
Bresnan did pretty well in the 2nd Test though IIRC with both bat and ball. I was also a sceptic too, I must confess.
Finn probably needed dropping but I'm not sure that Tremlett or Onions have done enough at county level to get back in at the moment. Long term I think Finn will be the one.
 
U

User482

Guest
It's Bairstow that worries me. How much time should we give him?
 

swee'pea99

Squire
Lots of breast-beating about how outplayed England were in this match. Surprisingly little speculation as to whether it might well not have gone exactly the same way in the other direction had England won the toss, given the pitch and the weather.

Mind you, having said that I'm sure the Aussies' tails will be up for the last two. Wouldn't like to be in Cook's shoes when he wins the toss in the next one and goes in to open...
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
[QUOTE 2586178, member: 1314"]That's his Test career finished. I've been an idiot myself as well at times, but someone like him well have his idiocy splashed in the national press.[/quote]
Hmm, I don't see him being able to spin his way out of this one! A real shame because he's always brought a lot of fun (along with his ability) to test cricket.
 

brodiej

Guru
Location
Waindell,
Lots of breast-beating about how outplayed England were in this match. Surprisingly little speculation as to whether it might well not have gone exactly the same way in the other direction had England won the toss, given the pitch and the weather.
.


Well that's true - but you could use that argument for anything.

If Australia won the toss in the first test they may easily have won that - they only very narrowly lost despite losing what was agreed at the time to be an important toss to win.
 

swee'pea99

Squire
Well that's true - but you could use that argument for anything.

If Australia won the toss in the first test they may easily have won that - they only very narrowly lost despite losing what was agreed at the time to be an important toss to win.

Absolutely. Equally true. Which doesn't of course make my comment any less true.
 

brodiej

Guru
Location
Waindell,
[QUOTE 2586558, member: 1314"]First I heard of the escapade I thought that’s really funny. Monty – who I thought was a teetotal vegetarian – getting drunk and weeing on the bouncers. Cricket shenanigans, I thought, like the pedalo, smoking weed whilst fielding etc. Then I read the story – “Cries for help” were heard as was chased and cornered. OK, he’ not hurt, I thought, still funny.


Then I read it was a Gay Pride event. Cool, I thought, Monty’s showing his modern. Then I read the bit that said he was thrown out of the club for harassing women. Not good, I thought. Idiot. He’ll never play for England again.[/quote]


Blimey - it get's worse.

Always seemed a decent bloke.
 
Interest in this thread seems to be on the wane, not surprising, really, as England, despite retaining the Ashes, are in the process of handing the urn back to the Aussies in the winter.

England's batting is frail, and the bottle and hard graft that the Aussies have shown in spades since the 2nd Test, don't appear to be there for England.

Back to this Test: England need a lead of at least 300 and to bat as long as possible tomorrow, otherwise I predict an easy chase for Australia, and then a tense final Test for a won or drawn series.
 
Top Bottom