matticus
Guru
Look at you with your fancy foreign names.
What’s wrong with Frank Proud.
Beautiful rock solid British name.
It's a brave man that bad-mouths The Falcon.
Look at you with your fancy foreign names.
What’s wrong with Frank Proud.
Beautiful rock solid British name.
look again......Wonder how far he'll get before he realises he's forgotten his pedals.
With a little more visual acuity/attention you would see he has Crank Brothers eggbeaters (or similar) fitted.Wonder how far he'll get before he realises he's forgotten his pedals.
With a little more visual acuity/attention you would see he has Crank Brothers eggbeaters (or similar) fitted.
look again......
View attachment 654309
I use of those mirrors (looks like a Sprintech mirror). Don't recall ever having any knee interference issues. I don't use flared bars. I normally use just one (right in UK left abroad, but have on occasion used two - on the ferry ). Of course my personal geometry is totally different so he may have interference problems.I am surprised he manages to avoid the bar-end mirror interfering with his right knee, but perhaps the bars are flared and we can't 'see' that'.
is it me or is the dot map very confusing regarding who is "leading"
View attachment 654319
ignoring the female and pairs class for a minute, the men (green markers) the number showing is their race number, fine, But like number 50 is in 41st, 232 is 200th, 159 a bit behind him on the road is in 136th??? To the north, 92 apparently in 77th, yet a 161 is in 138th ???
WTF? someone explain to me if you can....
yes I just told you that..It's not difficult - they are cap numbers, like rider numbers in a bike race.
(or a running race. Or football match, or ... etc ... etc .. )
So Fiona is given No1, and keeps that number until the end of the race.
p.s. no-one is really "leading" until they check into CP1, due to taking different routes.
However what i am actually asking is this position numberthe men (green markers) the number showing is their race number
look again......
View attachment 654309
yes I just told you that..
However what i am actually asking is this position number
![]()
I don't buy that the only judge position at check points, because they are so few check points and it would be blank, not saying 41st 202nd etc etc etc.
You can quite easily get the dot software to measure distance to next checkpoint from current position, but there is clearly more at work that that because that visually isn't consistent with how those positional number are appearing