I was self-debating whether to come back in here.
Just because some have differing opinions to you...(at least I do I would not want you to leave)...You are welcome on here in my book because this is what Cycle Chat is all about...differing opinions
Now why is there such antipathy towards motorists as a general group that some here think they must invent derogatory terms for members of other groups?
I wouldn't say I have....show too much to a motorist (sic) and I have had occasions where they come after me...so generally it's not worth it.I do cut up rusty at times but it's rarer than what it was.
To be frank, I don't see that much bad driving,
I do day in day out if it isn't mr cabbie one day it will be mr bus driver
Whatever the case, why does it seem to go so much against the grain to remain mostly civil and courteous, and to only descend to insults where a specific case or example is so deserving of it?
So, in a nutshell, why "cagers", or "motons" as general terms? That's no different from calling all cyclists "lycra louts", the description simply does not fit the majority. It's just primary school playground name-calling.
Well, in that sense, I'm past caring too. I started the thread with a simple question or request. If some bigots wish to remain bigoted then so be it, just be aware that, for no reason except your own prejudice you do not promote cyclists, and therefore cycling in a positive light to those other groups we'd like to engage.
Im classed as a bigot for using the term "moton on here?
Sure it's less dangerous than bad couldn't care less drivin.
So be it.