Discussion in 'CycleChat Cafe' started by mickle, 14 Apr 2019.
What does gammon mean then?
It's an insult based on someone's complexion. Imagine anyone ever doing something like that!
Maybe even spend a few minutes with ourselves, asking ourselves if we agree with the OP or not and the reasons why we do so.
Introspection not compulsory (I'm certainly not prone to it!) but a wee think about stuff sometimes is good, imo.
You may wish to start your own thread?
Only metaphorically. It's about the puceness of the rage, rather than the underlying skin colour.
I wasn't being serious about deleting the post , I was making a point, badly as usual
I don't believe other than the mods that anybody on here should be policing words they find offensive, it would never end, see "granny gear"
It was a simple question.
May as well say the original post was "loaded".
Have come back to trawl through this and at the point you made the comment I am replying to the OP definitely didn't answer my question.
If they did please point me at the answer.
er, yes I did.
Clue - it was the sentence with a question mark at the end.
Don't you see, it is not about being offended, as in "who are you calling pimp/are you trying to say I got my bike by pimping", it is about reflecting on the meaning of these words in the contest.
It's not about policing those words either, the Mods team is not going to censor "bike pimping"!
What I'm trying to say is that we should be able to discuss concerns like the OP's without dismissing them immediately, or, if we can't be bothered leave the OP be.
Metaphorical. Of course. I knew there'd be a valid, non-insulting reason.
As someone with mild rosacea the phrase slightly offends me......not enough to go puce with rage though. I'm too left wing for that.
People have differences of opinion and some are offended by stuff and others are not. Some of the 'stuff' of opinions is illegal, some of moderation, and some we'll have to learn to disagree on, like this
Which sentence is that then?
In that usage it is ageist and sexist. Is it therefore disallowed on this forum?
Luckily the thread is not advocating banning the metaphorical use of the word pimp, nor should it ban the metaphorical use of gammon.
In the overall scheme of things they are relatively mild and equally harmless metaphors, accepting that they can offend some people.
I suppose it is part of the bigger issue of whether we have the right not to be offended (or should that be right to be not offended?), and how much we should care (and/or amend our behaviour appropriately) about people's sensitivities.
You sweet delusional loon.
er, you have eyes?
The OP doesn't seem to have.
This is a question mark:
Separate names with a comma.