Quote:
Originally Posted by
User3143
No, it's people that take into account the ''what if'' scenarios that make the roads more dangerous for people that don't account for them.
You could go on all day about ''what if's'' and still come to the same conclusion and on this basis - it's bollox.
What on earth are you on about?
People who drive more safely(taking into account possibilities... ifs) are making the road more dangerous for the people that don't??
Can't you see how crazy that is?
There is a balance needed for the if, and the amount of risk something poses...
Here we have the risks of
speed and a
vulnerable road user, matched with (as people want to point out, but wasn't that close)
oncoming traffic, and maybe the
traffic island. Tell me, which risks can the driver control... (note: speed + passing distance).
Instead here, they decided not to reduce the speed or increase the passing distance... if they couldn't increase the passing distance because of the oncoming traffic/island, they should have used a more suitable speed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BentMikey
All he had to do was place his offside wheels near the dotted line like the other cars did, and it would have been a perfectly fine overtake, no risks from the oncoming traffic, and no risk to me either.
People are missing out that oncoming traffic would have most likely been slowing + moving as far to their left...
Even if they didn't "behave" there was still enough room... and after all a clipped wing mirror is a bit better than a broken elbow...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ben Lovejoy
No, it's an agreement to a like-for-like experience. If it hadn't been a police response car, I'd have been every bit as upset as you.
Anyway, as I say, let's just agree to disagree.
You need to calm down. I doubt any Class One driver would even want to attempt it anyway, and most people know this... thus people can bravado it up and say "yea sure, my kids can stand there all day and I won't be worried one bit...".