BentMikey said:
And the first person to get shirty was the cyclist, not Nethalus.
What of it?
How many of us here, when encountering a motorist doing something stupid, will respond
very politely to the driver in such a way as to make it clear that if the motorist is
still going to be in a bad mood he has to be
really unreasonable? Its a common tactic. And unless you've gone a lot further, it doesn't excuse the motorist then being outright rude.
Remember also, the cyclist may well have come from an entirely legal, decent road position (round the corner when the bus driver wasn't looking that way, then the bus driver signals and looks again, by which time the cyclist is now on the way around the bus and committed to going past). In such a situation you or I would also feel aggrieved if the bus moved out into our space.
But its also possible that the cyclist was being unreasonable; that
does not mean that the correct response from a professional driver, representing her employer, is to be really rude. Nethalus knows this, even she acknowledges that part was a mistake. Actually, I think thats by far the least serious of her three errors.
The really dangerous part was then out-accelerating a vehicle that was half way around her, i.e. the part that came next. But as, in her view (she's said this at least twice now) the cyclist
isn't traffic, she wasn't in error pulling out in front of it, and she wasn't in error accelerating out of the cyclist overtaking her. Out of context, just looking at Nethalus attitude to other road users, the belief that pulling out in front of another vehicle is not an error, and her opinion that contiunuing on illegally when you've done that... You don't find that a little unsettling?