BADGER.BRAD
Legendary Member
- Location
- Shropshire
Just found one with 40 teeth !
Please keep in mind that the rear derailleur must handle such large sprockets and the bigger difference between the gears in "big chain ring with the bigger sprockets" and "small chain ring with the smaller sprockets". Is the derailleur on your bike capable of that?Just found one with 40 teeth !
The chain line would have been terrible but I have just counted the number of teeth on the rear sprocket for the lowest gear which is 24, as it seems very easy to obtain cassettes with 36 teeth as the lowest gear I going to go with that and see if it is enough for my purpose. I have used these before on MTB based commuters but of course you still have another lower chain ring on the front mech , I'm not sure how this will compare with a bike with 20 inch wheels.
This was the next thing to look at as well as is the current chain long enough to cope with the two large gears. It seems that in solving one problem ie: how to carry a bike with my small car allowing me to commute over the river saving me 8 miles in the car each way and giving me some exercise has caused a load more problems else where. I hope I can solve it as no other way is possible !Please keep in mind that the rear derailleur must handle such large sprockets and the bigger difference between the gears in "big chain ring with the bigger sprockets" and "small chain ring with the smaller sprockets". Is the derailleur on your bike capable of that?
This was the next thing to look at as well as is the current chain long enough to cope with the two large gears. It seems that in solving one problem ie: how to carry a bike with my small car allowing me to commute over the river saving me 8 miles in the car each way and giving me some exercise has caused a load more problems else where. I hope I can solve it as no other way is possible !
But your rear mech needs to be able to cope with the larger sprocket.
If considering changing the chainset to a 50/34 or smaller, can the front mech be moved down an inch or so?
The old saying "If it ain't broke, don't fix it", might be applicable
A quick look at a ‘gear inch’ calculator tells me that on your current chainset a 32 tooth gear would give you a 50% improvement over your 24 tooth gear. Apparently this should get you up 10-15% inclines.
I'm not quite sure what you mean here !
Surely (32-24) / 24 = 8 / 24 = 1 / 3 = 33.3333%?
Just been having a look, with the current lowest gear combination this is how it looks
View attachment 812889
Tomorrow morning I'm going to try the journey as it is . As I have just about made it in the past on a MTB in the lowest gear I'm not holding my breath !
In truth I'm beginning to think this myself my original plan to part commute by bike may be impossible sort of defeating my original purchase of the bike. I either make the bike impossible to use for anything other than my commute or don't commute by bike.Basically, you have a good working transmission, with all components matching and working. Trying to change bits for a marginal gain, (ok substantial going uphill), could be a lot of effort to get a better transmission
Unfortunately my planned commute is down a very steep hill across a foot bridge over the River Severn then up a very steep hill so either way it involves a very steep upwards hill. Meaning I would just be pushing the bike. This commute would mean I save 8 miles from my car part of the commute so I would not add to much time from my commute, It would also mean I am not travelling on narrow very twisty turnie ( new invented word) extremely up and down unlit 60 mph roads in the dark (3 to 4 am)Getting off to push it up a hill is always an option, as is changing your route to trade height for distance?
I have just attempted my proposed commute (All be it as part of a route) and either way it is impossible to pedal up the hill as is, I gave it a really good go but the amount of strain I'm putting on the poor thing is going to lead to something breaking ( possibly me !)