J.Primus
Senior Member
In that case you'd just drive as normal in a straight line and pass the cyclist. As the road is wide enough for a car and cyclist to use the road side by side no one is inconvenienced in the slightest.
Came out of the bike lock up at work and stopped at the first lights.Did you not pass her before reaching the first light then?
Why not? If you're inconveniencing people by doing something both easily avoidable and unneccessary it is the very definition of inconsiderate.
I was talking nicely to a girl in a pub the other day and she was saying how nice most on her commute are. She isn't the fastest and most confident so is terrified of queuing up behind all teh other commuters so always shuffles to the front out of harms way.
There, as she has been told and always used to see when driving, the cyclist (her) is not alongside or 'within' traffic and can safely pull away on here own as soon as safe to do so.
She just wishes that she had the chance to chat and thank all the other commuters for understanding her actions but she is normally out of breath trying her best not to hold others up too much as she commutes to work trying to get fitter.
A seasoned cyclist did tell her once how it is always safer to be out front away from the cars and that is the reason for ASL etc - simple really!
ANyway, hopefully you get my point?![]()
It would make more sense if your point had some sort of basis in reality.
I don't think the speed of the cyclist comes into it.
If you approach a group of cyclists already at the lights you don't know who is the faster off the mark.
It's just rude to go to the front of a queue.
You wouldn't do it in asda so don't do it at the lights.
I think going past cars is slightly different, that's what the asl's are there for afterall.