Did a second ride on RGT last night around the Durango course. My cough has gone away so I had a bit more of a push. Though I'm well down on power, it was nice to spin the legs around. My takeaway observations:
It's unbelievably boring. The scenery passes really slowly and, because a lot of the roads are straight, there's little sensation of speed.
Although there are bots around to try to chase down, they seem to be doing interval training; 'Harmon' was pootling along at 2.9w/kg until he hit the climb, whereupon he held 5.2w/kg for its duration. It's difficult to manage your expectations of whom you're going to chase down and catch if the bots are riding so inconsistently. I saw three real people out on course, one of whom was stationary.
The only other subscription-free course is Stelvio, which might be a little better, but I suspect it'll be a long, featureless slog. I'll give it a try if I get a touch of insomnia.
I haven't worked out the meaning of the colour-coded stripe under my name on the screen and up the sidebar. My wattage appeared a bit less consistent than when I ride Zwift - is it an instantaneous power, rather than a 3s average? I've got no idea what's going on with the in-game segment leaderboards - are they all-time, or today, or of current riders? Either way, it all seems a bit irrelevant if you're not near the top. Not sure why I need my time measuring to the nearest thousandth of a second... Oh yeah, I'm calling BS on the Czech guy who appears to have done the Shalona climb at 48.4km/h, too.
View attachment 633611
Races might be a different matter - I can imagine that, against IRL competitors, it'd be good for a change. However, I can't see any attraction in riding RGT over Zwift for free-rides or workouts, unless I were to be completely abandon Zwift and save myself the subscription fee.