Sara_H
Guru
I think the assertion many are trying to make is that he didn't walk across the pedestrian crossing but across the road along side it. Some people seem to think this is illegal.If you're walking, you're a pedestrian and have every right to go over a pedestrian crossing like this guy did. If he'd cycled over a pedestrian crossing then that would have been different because he could have cycled over/into a pedestrian. But he became a pedestrian in order to use the crossing... which is the whole point of it.
I'm kind of surprised by people's responses to the contrary.
I don't understand. It would be legal to walk or run there without a bike, why would it be illegal with one. What's the difference?