U
User482
Guest
Preston NE, featuring Howard Kendall who was the youngest ever player in a final.@Smokin Joe , was that final v man utd ?
Preston NE, featuring Howard Kendall who was the youngest ever player in a final.@Smokin Joe , was that final v man utd ?
John Sissons of West Ham was all set to become the youngest then PNE made a late decision to include Kendall. West Ham scored three goals in every winning round (They drew 1-1 with Leyton Orient in the fourth), and seven of the team in the final had surnames beginning with B.Preston NE, featuring Howard Kendall who was the youngest ever player in a final.
John Sissons of West Ham was all set to become the youngest then PNE made a late decision to include Kendall. West Ham scored three goals in every winning round (They drew 1-1 with Leyton Orient in the fourth), and seven of the team in the final had surnames beginning with B.
Just so's you know, like...
I know loads of stuff that doesn't really matter.
I see Liverpool managed a 0-0 draw against Plymouth Argyle yesterday. Well done them.
I thought it was quite brave to play such a young side. However it would probably have been better if they'd lost as now Klopp has a tough decision to make:I see Liverpool managed a 0-0 draw against Plymouth Argyle yesterday. Well done them.
It was only the arrival of the internet that uncovered a lie we'd been told for years - and were gullible enough to believe it! We had a new porter arrived in our hospital who was a tall, thin athletic figure of the right age to fit what he told us. He said he'd been a professional at PNE and played as a centre-half and had played in every game up to the final when they decided to play Kendall instead of him and how gutted he was. Of course, all us impressionable lads would tell all our mates that we worked with the 'unluckiest player' in England for ages afterwards.Preston NE, featuring Howard Kendall who was the youngest ever player in a final.
I thought it was quite brave to play such a young side. However it would probably have been better if they'd lost as now Klopp has a tough decision to make:
- Play the same side in Plymouth thereby showing faith in them
- Take the senior side but that then means an extra game.
Still when it all goes pear shaped, we can do a Wenger/Mourinho and claim fixture congestion.
I thought it was quite brave to play such a young side. However it would probably have been better if they'd lost as now Klopp has a tough decision to make:
- Play the same side in Plymouth thereby showing faith in them
- Take the senior side but that then means an extra game.
Still when it all goes pear shaped, we can do a Wenger/Mourinho and claim fixture congestion.
I thought it was quite brave to play such a young side. However it would probably have been better if they'd lost as now Klopp has a tough decision to make:
- Play the same side in Plymouth thereby showing faith in them
- Take the senior side but that then means an extra game.
Still when it all goes pear shaped, we can do a Wenger/Mourinho and claim fixture congestion.
Don't beat about the bush, tell us what you really think. What have you got against Bradford Park Avenue?
- Make them hand in their Hublots and Audi RS's and sent 'em on loan to Bradford Park Avenue for a month, I think their next outing would show a modicum of genuine desire. Lazy, self absorbed, useless, clog footed oafs.
I thought it was quite brave to play such a young side. However it would probably have been better if they'd lost as now Klopp has a tough decision to make:
- Play the same side in Plymouth thereby showing faith in them
- Take the senior side but that then means an extra game.
Still when it all goes pear shaped, we can do a Wenger/Mourinho and claim fixture congestion.
LFC cannae win anything. Full. Stop."You can't win anything with kids."