Ford had those laurels in 1980's when along with the other big manufacturers in America they aimed to get their cars to do 30mpg. At the time my Citroen happily did 50mpg. Also they have had how long to make an electric car ? GM started then sabotaged their own electric cars.
So Tesla's track record looks pretty good.
Market forces were different 40 years ago (was it really 40 years ago?!)
With oil so cheap, and 'encouragement' from big oil in the US at political, social and business levels to keep burning their product there was not the incentive there is now.
Aye, being generous if one must it's fair to say that GM acted rather bizarrely at best over their initial electric car market experiments.
But is Teslas track record good?
Volvo, who make hoth electric and ICE cars and who have a track record of open and honest6 in everything from safety through to emissions, reckon it takes 70,000 miles of use before an electric car breaks even CO2 emissions-wise with a comparable ICE car.
Tesla, who have never made a single ICE car, reckon its 20,000 miles.
I know who I beleive.
Even worse for Tesla the video I posted yesterday shows the design and assembly of their monocoque is unnecessary complicated in design and takes more effort, and therefore energy, to manufacturer. They are decades behind their rivals with their monocoque and the requieed production inefficiency it brings. This would put Teslas offering beyond someone like Volvo who are skilled and have 70 years experience in mass producing monocoque structures, making even a 70,000 miles break-even hopelessly optimistic for Tesla.
When someone can't even lie straight in bed their track record is anything but good.