Time Waster
Veteran
I just think safe energy conversion without electricity storage will be better than battery storage systems like EVs.
What is your view on what that next step might be?I don't think anyone serious thinks EV s are the solution just like hybrids weren't. They're perhaps less obviously a stage on the journey to some than hybrids but they're just as much a step in the journey to something better that truly works for society and the environment.
My view is how long before the next step in that journey comes? I think it might be possible to skip EVs as they are now and get the next tech along if it comes in early enough.
The most fuel efficient combustion engines currently on the market are 40% efficient. So only 40% of what you put in can be converted to power to drive the car forward. The remaining 60% is heat and friction - that's why car engines are hot.I stand to be corrected, but I doubt very much the EVs are significantly more efficient in and of themselves.
You're still wrong about the issue with ozone, and the rest of your post misses quite a bit, which means your summary doesn't altogether hold up either, especially with the reduction in emission reduction research due to the pending ban on production and sale.![]()
How much did you spend on your EV to get you into this position?
That has to be the worst advice given in over 100 pages, anybody who rents a car on PCP needs to examine their motives, why you would encourage anyone to throw money at an asset, only not to have any asset at the end of the term.Get a leased EV,.
Simple. It's the motoring equivalent of renting vs buying. It's nice to be in the position to buy, but rental carries a lot of benefits too.That has to be the worst advice given in over 100 pages, anybody who rents a car on PCP needs to examine their motives, why you would encourage anyone to throw money at an asset, only not to have any asset at the end of the term.
That has to be the worst advice given in over 100 pages, anybody who rents a car on PCP needs to examine their motives, why you would encourage anyone to throw money at an asset, only not to have any asset at the end of the term.
If EV works for yourself then that's good, it won't work for me purely & simply on a financial footing, I do not have the £30K to buy one
My view is how long before the next step in that journey comes? I think it might be possible to skip EVs as they are now and get the next tech along if it comes in early enough.
It is just rental as opposed to purchase.That has to be the worst advice given in over 100 pages, anybody who rents a car on PCP needs to examine their motives, why you would encourage anyone to throw money at an asset, only not to have any asset at the end of the term.
Neither do I (though in theory I could just about). But when I'm next changing one of our cars (probably 2-3 years time), I fully expect to be able to get a decent 2nd hand one for more like £10K. And with a good big solar system, it will be cheap to run.If EV works for yourself then that's good, it won't work for me purely & simply on a financial footing, I do not have the £30K to buy one
I will use our Nissan Leaf as the example, being an average price EV. We paid £26k for it. The mileage covered and saving from cheap overnight electric compared to an equivalent petrol car, equated to buying the Leaf new for £9k.
Now savings are still to be had, but less so due to electric price increases. However fossil fuel prices are at a all time high.
Get a leased EV, the money saved in fuel will offset the payments to near or equal petrol car.
That has to be the worst advice given in over 100 pages, anybody who rents a car on PCP needs to examine their motives, why you would encourage anyone to throw money at an asset, only not to have any asset at the end of the term.
If EV works for yourself then that's good, it won't work for me purely & simply on a financial footing, I do not have the £30K to buy one