

Chuffy said:Nope. Full head-o-hair here.
I have no idea what you baldy blokes are talking about.![]()
![]()

and one of my brothers has followed suit (tee hee). One of my granddads had a full head of hair when he pegged it age 85; mine seems to have genes from a bit of both... my hair receded quite a lot in my mid 30s, but now (mid 40s) it seems to have stopped receding (honest!)... it's been the same for about 5 yrs now, and others have raced ahead of me in the slappy stakes.
yello said:I'm not quite "couldn't care less", because I'd rather have a head of hair than not in honesty, but I'm not going to loose anyhairsleep over it.
Chuffy said:Nope. Full head-o-hair here.
I have no idea what you baldy blokes are talking about.![]()
![]()
) but that was then, this is now! 


Are you sure you're not from Bauld Reekie?Hairy Jock said:With a user name like mine, what do you think? I could be being ironic![]()
for asking him if he was wearing a wig! 
Flying_Monkey said:My only problem is that my hair still looks like it did when I was 16...


Noodley said:That would be a worry for me - when I was 16 I had a perm at the front and short at the back.
I was at the barbers today and got #1 all over - it saves so much time![]()