Archie_tect
De Skieven Architek... aka Penfold + Horace
- Location
- Northumberland
The question whether one should have worn a helmet is irrelevant for those people who should have but didn't and as a consequence aren't around to debate the point.
Archie_tect said:The question whether one should have worn a helmet is irrelevant for those people who should have but didn't and as a consequence aren't around to debate the point.
Kirstie said:Absolutely hilarious age bands: 35 - 60?!?!?!?
Noodley said:I sense yet another 'researcher' who is not interested in the forum.![]()
One of the problems with the latest FIA, etc. approval for crash helmets is the impact requirements are getting higher & higher. This is great for those huge crashes but there's a fair amount of concern that the latest standards are no longer protecting against the smaller impacts & the head it's self is heavily impacted via percussion though the helmet's structure. I wonder if this could be an issue with using motorbike helmets? They'd be great if you binned at 40mph on a down hill section but may afford little to no effective protection at lower speeds. I duno, just thinking on the keyboard.NorfolkNewbie said:Something that's been occuring to me after reading some of the comments about helmets is that if they ARE so useless, why don't we all wear motorcycle helmets instead when cycling?
I'm not offering ... but just a thought into the mix.
NorfolkNewbie said:Something that's been occuring to me after reading some of the comments about helmets is that if they ARE so useless, why don't we all wear motorcycle helmets instead when cycling?
I'm not offering ... but just a thought into the mix.
Flying_Monkey said:Yes, I know... and some of the fields have data entry limits which are way too small to add any meaningful explaination. The student probably needs to look a bit more carefully at research methods and in particular at survey design. I was always telling my students this, but they still seemed to think it was just a matter of common sense. It isn't.
And yes, what on earth is the rationale for 35-60? It doesn't seem to fit any social categories...
Flying_Monkey said:And yes, what on earth is the rationale for 35-60? It doesn't seem to fit any social categories...