thomas
the tank engine
- Location
- Woking/Norwich
mr_cellophane said:yes, because they ban underage drivers who take cars and drive recklessly. For them the ban doesn't start until they apply for a licence.
Yet, he could still go out tomorrow and kill someone on his bike....well, when he is out of Prison. Unlike underage drivers, if I didn't have a drivers licence by the time I was 20, it probably shows a lack of interest in learning to drive. Simply get the licence, wait a year for it to expire...and possibly even then not bother driving for another 10 years, or the rest of my life.
The punishment is not equal.
User482 said:The driving ban might apply because he was charged with an offence that applies to all vehicles, rather than cyclists specifically.
You are probably right, but (not directed at you) it seems stupid to ban someone from driving a car, when cycles are not licensed vehicles and therefore don't require a driver's licence. If I was to cycle back from the pub over the drink drive limit, should I get the punishment for that and loose my driver's licence?
However, 7 months for cycling dangerously and killing someone doesn't sound like much IMO. Maybe turn that into years for something remotely just.
The point of him being on the pavement to jump a red light is only there to make it news worthy as it plays on common sterotypes. Cycling on the pavement is not dangerous. Cycling like a twat is, be that on the pavement or not. In the same way speeding is not necessarily dangerous. However an excessive use of speed is (now that could mean doing 15mph in a 30mph).