Exactly.I just bought a Brompton, not because it is exciting or innovative but because it's tried, tested and just does what I want it to do.
I am not sure that that is his responsibility.
Right now, I would rather he moved existing Bromptons on a bit. A bit lighter, nicer gears, hinge clamps that don't rotate, etc.
It's a bit disappointing if that's all the R&D people could come up with. Where's the model with 20" wheels? Can they continue to ride on their past success? I don't know but with much more exciting and innovative models coming out from rivals I'm sure questions are being asked in the boardroom. The spectre of Nokia and Blackberry must be haunting them.
As I've stated quite a few times on Brompton threads, it's massively over-engineered. The central beam can be drastically reduced in weight, and there's also weight savings to be made in the steerer tube and elsewhere without affecting backwards compatibility. Those would save at least 1.5kg and attract far more people who would struggle to routinely carry 10kg along platforms and onto trains.
I don't know of any equal rival bike that can compete on price and size of the fold, if you consider that the bike is essentially designed for London, it pretty much goes wherever you can go in a form factor that won't (usually) get you thrown off a train. I couldn't do that with a Tern or a Dahon, and I wouldn't want to carry either of those up or down some stairs. You can have all the innovation in the world, but if it ceases to be practical it counts for nothing.
The over engineering as you term it is something i like. Call me a daft patriot, but it rather makes me think of old phone boxes. I prefer to think of it as overbuilt. Ie, it will outlast many an over-engineered (as in value engineered) box of tricks.As I've stated quite a few times on Brompton threads, it's massively over-engineered. The central beam can be drastically reduced in weight, and there's also weight savings to be made in the steerer tube and elsewhere without affecting backwards compatibility. Those would save at least 1.5kg and attract far more people who would struggle to routinely carry 10kg along platforms and onto trains.
The over engineering as you term it is something i like. Call me a daft patriot, but it rather makes me think of old phone boxes. I prefer to think of it as overbuilt. Ie, it will outlast many an over-engineered (as in value engineered) box of tricks.
And bromptons of course don't have to be carried far - that's what the wheels are for.