Brompton 2017 bikes new features

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Cycleops

Legendary Member
Location
Accra, Ghana
Brompton need to get a new MD. Batteries need to catch up with motors and that's not happening at the moment. He'd better not be right about the future of pedal power or his company will come an almighty cropper. I'm sure he knows a one product company can't continue like that indefinitely no matter how successful they are.
 
Last edited:
Location
London
I just bought a Brompton, not because it is exciting or innovative but because it's tried, tested and just does what I want it to do.
Exactly.

More strength to Brompton.
I have a Dahon Speed Pro - the things I could tell you about that (including an admission from someone rather close to its production/speccing) - Dahon clearly changed the specs on bikes as they passed down the production line, forgetting some basics in the process.

My Brompton is from last century, is still going strong and may outlive me.
 

Cycleops

Legendary Member
Location
Accra, Ghana
I am not sure that that is his responsibility.

Maybe not but it's certainly his responsibility to move the Brompton e bike forward and that means finding alternatives whether it's new better batteries or alternatives like fuel cells if he thinks people should 'kiss goodbye to pedal powered bicycles'.
 

Kell

Veteran
Right now, I would rather he moved existing Bromptons on a bit. A bit lighter, nicer gears, hinge clamps that don't rotate, etc.

This quote from Will Carleysmith suggests that that's their plan:

“What we’re going to release will be the most compact, the lightest, folding electric bike, and it will have the performance and power of the full size products that dominate the market.”

http://www.thememo.com/2016/09/19/b...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
 

the_mikey

Legendary Member
It's a bit disappointing if that's all the R&D people could come up with. Where's the model with 20" wheels? Can they continue to ride on their past success? I don't know but with much more exciting and innovative models coming out from rivals I'm sure questions are being asked in the boardroom. The spectre of Nokia and Blackberry must be haunting them.

I don't know of any equal rival bike that can compete on price and size of the fold, if you consider that the bike is essentially designed for London, it pretty much goes wherever you can go in a form factor that won't (usually) get you thrown off a train. I couldn't do that with a Tern or a Dahon, and I wouldn't want to carry either of those up or down some stairs. You can have all the innovation in the world, but if it ceases to be practical it counts for nothing.
 
As I've stated quite a few times on Brompton threads, it's massively over-engineered. The central beam can be drastically reduced in weight, and there's also weight savings to be made in the steerer tube and elsewhere without affecting backwards compatibility. Those would save at least 1.5kg and attract far more people who would struggle to routinely carry 10kg along platforms and onto trains.
 

Melvil

Guest
As I've stated quite a few times on Brompton threads, it's massively over-engineered. The central beam can be drastically reduced in weight, and there's also weight savings to be made in the steerer tube and elsewhere without affecting backwards compatibility. Those would save at least 1.5kg and attract far more people who would struggle to routinely carry 10kg along platforms and onto trains.

I like your thinking there. I would certainly buy a re-engineered central beam and so would, I imagine, a lot of other B owners. The gears in the video are a mixed bag, in my view. I prefer the position of them under the grips so that it's easier to nudge them with your thumb, but I am not sure I want to nudge>nudge from 1 to 3 instead of whack>done as I do at the moment.
 

Melvil

Guest
PS on a totally unrelated note I got the roll-top bag for my B (on offer £55) a few weeks ago and it's brilliant. Very happy with it.
 

Cycleops

Legendary Member
Location
Accra, Ghana
I don't know of any equal rival bike that can compete on price and size of the fold, if you consider that the bike is essentially designed for London, it pretty much goes wherever you can go in a form factor that won't (usually) get you thrown off a train. I couldn't do that with a Tern or a Dahon, and I wouldn't want to carry either of those up or down some stairs. You can have all the innovation in the world, but if it ceases to be practical it counts for nothing.

I think what we're failing to remember here is that Brompton is not a 'bike' company or better put not an 'enthusiast's bike' product, they facilitate transport across cities. I don't know if you watched the Google talk video in its entirety but Will Butler- Adams made the point that the Brompton was a bike you rode in your regular clothes without needing to put on some 'funny dress'. In this role it's superbly suited for the task. You can ride it in your work clothes, doesn't weigh too much and can easily slip under your desk or wherever. Of course people use it in other roles very successfully but this is not its intended market.

Sure Dahon, Tern and others are also making products to compete head to head with Brompton as city transport but they are also after the enthusiast market with bigger wheels and performance oriented kit. Weight and size is not so much of an issue as these people don't want to carry them on a bus or train or lug them up stairs, more likely they'll put them in the car boot, caravan or boat.

Brompton see the future as electric bikes mainly I think as its a growing market and they can maximise their profit so are happy to just tinker around with their current product without seeing the need to give it a major overhaul, after all sales are still holding up.
 
Location
London
As I've stated quite a few times on Brompton threads, it's massively over-engineered. The central beam can be drastically reduced in weight, and there's also weight savings to be made in the steerer tube and elsewhere without affecting backwards compatibility. Those would save at least 1.5kg and attract far more people who would struggle to routinely carry 10kg along platforms and onto trains.
The over engineering as you term it is something i like. Call me a daft patriot, but it rather makes me think of old phone boxes. I prefer to think of it as overbuilt. Ie, it will outlast many an over-engineered (as in value engineered) box of tricks.
And bromptons of course don't have to be carried far - that's what the wheels are for.
 

12boy

Guru
Location
Casper WY USA
There are many things that could be done to improve Bromptons as far as I am concerned, including disk brakes, a stem that would allow for a 1 1/8 inch threadless stem so it could be more adjustable and so one could change the handlebars without removing every thing on one side,more IGH options etc, but I really like the massive frame with its solid hinge that can be tightened without wearing out soft aluminum parts like most other folders.I think the weight is reasonable considering the longevity I expect from the bike and its ability to carry a lot of weight in the front. If it is heavy to pedal I can lose a few pounds. I expect to leave this bike to my offspring, as a matter of fact.
 
The over engineering as you term it is something i like. Call me a daft patriot, but it rather makes me think of old phone boxes. I prefer to think of it as overbuilt. Ie, it will outlast many an over-engineered (as in value engineered) box of tricks.
And bromptons of course don't have to be carried far - that's what the wheels are for.

Not all stations have lifts - some have long flights of stairs. I found carrying a Brompton very tiresome.
 
Top Bottom