JamesAC said:My mate and I devised a measurement system based on the BSH - the British Standard Handful, for measuring ladies, err, chests.![]()
661-Pete said:Anyone know the common name of my avatar (at time of posting)? Very pertinent, I'd say...
Moreover, astronomers are plagued with Whitworth and other non-standard threads all over their equipment, to the despair of those wanting to standardise. Why is this? I just put "Whitworth" into the search box of one of the Astro forums and came up with plenty of hits! I suppose it's the old story: American influence (q. why do Americans use BSW = British Standard Whitworth?)
661-Pete said:Anyone know the common name of my avatar (at time of posting)? Very pertinent, I'd say...
Moreover, astronomers are plagued with Whitworth and other non-standard threads all over their equipment, to the despair of those wanting to standardise. Why is this? I just put "Whitworth" into the search box of one of the Astro forums and came up with plenty of hits! I suppose it's the old story: American influence (q. why do Americans use BSW = British Standard Whitworth?)
Touché, I should have said "non-metric". At least threads in cycle bits and pieces are mostly metric. Or are they (*waits to be corrected*)?The Velvet Curtain said:Whit was a standard thread, it was first made common across the railways and was adopted by the car and aircraft industries. It was only when the Americans got involved in the war that they wanted a unified thread form and the Whit started to fall out of favour.
And that is all I remember on the subject from my Engineering Degree many years ago,
dellzeqq said:might I ask - what's with Italian BB threads?