humboldt
Well-Known Member
Recently carrying even my little messenger bag with the bare minimum has become extremely uncomfortable in this heat, so I was going to get a Super C pannier or two but sadly my oversized rack won't take them. I could get a pair of small Ortlieb panniers for a good price from SJS but the shiny tarp look just doesn't go with my bike in my opinion (for reference: https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/anyone-else-aiming-for-a-more-relaxed-commute.234918/).
While I wait for Carradice to manufacture more of the little pannier adaptor rails, which they've told me won't be any time soon, I've thought about either getting one of their lovely green saddlebags since I have the necessary loops on my Brooks (and the honey leather matches my saddle nicely) or the Super C rack pbag which fixes to the rack with velcro.
I usually take at least one D-lock, my packed lunch in a small tupperware container, a little multi-tool, a rolled up windbreaker or poncho depending on the wind and rain forecast, my sunglasses, wallet, phone etc, and sometimes a fleece or jumper and dry socks depending on the season. I'm not intending to carry a lot of shopping home in these but it would be nice to be able to fit in a packet of pasta, a tin of tomatoes and a bottle of beer for example.
The saddlebags look to have a bit more space but are a bit fiddly to remove if it's needed (I don't always get a bike shed depending on the office I'm at so wouldn't feel confident leaving the bag on the bike in some areas even if I have taken the contents with me). The sprung saddle unfortunately conflicts with any of the quick release racks other than the SQR, and that system seems like it's for people who lack the saddle loops anyway and adds on another £30. The rack bag is obviously easier to take off but isn't quite as handsome, although I think it does still look good. There seem to be a lot of die-hard fans of Carradice's saddlebags but not so many vocal proponents of the rack bag - anyone care to give an opinion?
I know, I could just get the Ortliebs and forget it, but aesthetics play a big part too in making a purchase. I don't think they are ugly panniers before any Ortlieb fans jump in, just prefer other things for this bike in particular.
While I wait for Carradice to manufacture more of the little pannier adaptor rails, which they've told me won't be any time soon, I've thought about either getting one of their lovely green saddlebags since I have the necessary loops on my Brooks (and the honey leather matches my saddle nicely) or the Super C rack pbag which fixes to the rack with velcro.
I usually take at least one D-lock, my packed lunch in a small tupperware container, a little multi-tool, a rolled up windbreaker or poncho depending on the wind and rain forecast, my sunglasses, wallet, phone etc, and sometimes a fleece or jumper and dry socks depending on the season. I'm not intending to carry a lot of shopping home in these but it would be nice to be able to fit in a packet of pasta, a tin of tomatoes and a bottle of beer for example.
The saddlebags look to have a bit more space but are a bit fiddly to remove if it's needed (I don't always get a bike shed depending on the office I'm at so wouldn't feel confident leaving the bag on the bike in some areas even if I have taken the contents with me). The sprung saddle unfortunately conflicts with any of the quick release racks other than the SQR, and that system seems like it's for people who lack the saddle loops anyway and adds on another £30. The rack bag is obviously easier to take off but isn't quite as handsome, although I think it does still look good. There seem to be a lot of die-hard fans of Carradice's saddlebags but not so many vocal proponents of the rack bag - anyone care to give an opinion?
I know, I could just get the Ortliebs and forget it, but aesthetics play a big part too in making a purchase. I don't think they are ugly panniers before any Ortlieb fans jump in, just prefer other things for this bike in particular.