I didn't think these 'red bike' and 'green bike' light symbols were widely used in the UK: indeed I seldom come across one, mainly because my preferred routes on the roads don't go anywhere near them I suppose. There is
one such light, a 'green bike only', synchronised with the green man for pedestrians, that I know about, on my commute - my wife drew my attention to it, but she too ignores it, as I do. We ignore it for a very good reason, which is that
we can't see it - not from our normal waiting position on the road that is! To get to it I would first have to veer off the road I'm on and mount the opposite pavement, then execute two 90° turns to line myself up with the pedestrian crossing. And mix it with the pedestrians.
Sorry, I seem to have departed off topic onto a rant about cycling 'facilities' in general, but my point is, I wouldn't have known about the rights or wrongs of jumping a 'red bike' if there is one, because such things are beyond my experience.
As for the bad Press, well, here we go again. It just goes on and on and on - we had Parris last year and thought it couldn't get any worse, but... cycling infractions however venial dominate the Press view of cycling, the same tired old arguments come up again and again. I really don't know how we win this one. It doesn't count, however much you're contributing towards making this planet a better place to live in; and it's useless to continue arguing that point. You belong to an unpopular class of people, you simply remain unpopular, come what may.





