Not always the case. Often you're nowt but something travelling slower than they can & something that can get out of their way.I wouldn't expect hi-viz to get me a wider overtake / pass, but I'd expect it to get me seen sooner (hopefully) on these dark winter nights and have the driver be in a better position as they approach to overtake.
I wouldn't expect hi-viz to get me a wider overtake / pass, but I'd expect it to get me seen sooner (hopefully) on these dark winter nights and have the driver be in a better position as they approach to overtake.
I wouldn't expect hi-viz to get me a wider overtake / pass, but I'd expect it to get me seen sooner (hopefully) on these dark winter nights and have the driver be in a better position as they approach to overtake.
i kind of agree with this. i do wear hi viz a lot of the time (i've got a really stylish hi viz jersey i love) but i think sometimes a black silhouette against low sun makes you stand out more. and i think reflectives work best at night. for anything approaching from behind anyway. (oo er mrs)Erm no. I saw the exact opposite this week commuting into Manchester via the A34 which is dead straight.
Being a cyclist anyway (erm) I could see 3 ahead of me for about half a mile.
The only one that stood out in the murky daylight, was the one running a good rear light. He had no high viz. the other two had dayglo, which you would expect helped, it didn't. It was light, but heavily overcast. Reflectives help, but only if the car is pointing at you.
but a lot of drivers perceptions about how skilled we are is based on what they see us wearing. They think just coz someone is on a sit up and beg bike they don't know what their doing, but if their own a road bike they probably do. I don't think it even occurs to them we have more than one bike!Sadly the study didn't look at driver behaviour during poor light times. They didn't even collect data if it was raining! I would have thought low light conditions are when high viz is most useful.
Strangely it looks like all the outfits (apart from the saeco kit) has at least one element of high viz on them, while the conclusions don't seem to take that into account.
Much like the researcher's previous study on cycle helmets, this will be used to argue a point that the researcher is not trying to make. He seems interested in how driver behaviour is influenced by the perception of cyclist skill and experience. This he believes is determined by what the cyclist is wearing (or gender in the helmet study).
but a lot of drivers perceptions about how skilled we are is based on what they see us wearing. They think just coz someone is on a sit up and beg bike they don't know what their doing, but if their own a road bike they probably do. I don't think it even occurs to them we have more than one bike!