Confronting someone whilst recording every word and action is protection in itself, if his aim was to simply 'educate' then the need for recording doesn't exist.
If his aim is prosecution, which in part it is, then anonymous filming would be adequate.
The bloke likes the attention and the 'power ' he knows the camera affords him, without that he would have had his face punched in long ago.
Of course he looks for the attention via his blog/tweets/YouTube, or whatever he uses. That is obvious, and I doubt his aim is simply to educate them.
Whether he would have had his face punched in long ago is arguable and unprovable, as is your assertion he is "hiding" behind a camera. Without the camera he could not do what he does so there would be no point to it.
I suspect he doesn't give a toss about what other people think of his actions because he believes they are justifiable and successful. The fact that people spend so much time discussing his actions probably tells him his tactics are working, as do the prosecutions that arise from those actions.
Criticise away, meanwhile he will carry on filming and helping the police prosecute drivers who are breaking the law.
Even though Lampard did not get prosecuted over this latest film I bet he regrets doing it and will think twice about doing it again because of the bad publicity and the high fees for his loophole solicitor, so another result for Bikey Mikey.
