ebikeerwidnes
Guru
- Location
- Z’ha’dum
But the boy never made a mistake, under the hierarchy of the road the driver has a duty of care which it seems like in the vicinity of a crossing they showed.
Technically correct
but the boy also have responsibilities
judging the stopping ability of the car/driver to within 50cm was risky - if the driver had blinked he would have been closer - or hit!
One of those where it went OK - but of the boy had been run over the driver would not have been judged "at fault" because it was too close
Although a driver has a responsibility to avoid a collision whenever possible - so has the pedestrian
I'm sure there is something about it in the HC
can;t be bothered to look it up at the moment