[QUOTE 1240559"]
Well, there you go, you tend to prefer intelligent men. Simple. A thick Brad Pitt/George Clooney/Whoever would not do it for you. (Although to be fair, I'd probably give a dim Kylie Minogue a go

) You know this from your past experience.
It does not mean you are going you are going to be rude or obnoxious to dim blokes, just that you won't invest so much time in getting to know their personality, because they are not your type. I don't know you in real life, but chances are any bloke you were serious about would have to take into account, if not enjoy cycling? He would have to be clever, he would have to have similar thoughts on green issues, and so on and so on. Like I said, it really doesn't make you bad.
[/quote]
How clever. You've done that thing where someone turns through 180 degrees and argues an opposite view.
There have been a few replies about personality being more important, absolute nonsense. If you didn't find someone had a attractive quality, you wouldn't even speak to them to get to know their personality
There is lots of work to show that far from being given a chance to persaude someone of their sparkling personlity, fat, ugly, smelly people get ignored. They could be the most dazzling wit in the party, but no-one will ever know.
You were arguing that we all rely on looks - no one would give an ugly person a second chance. I pointed out that I tend to prefer intelligence, and suddenly, this proves your point? Actually reading back, I notice you've actually crept round gradually to replace physical attractiveness with other qualities.
I never argued that people don't have certain preferences, merely that people don't all go on looks.
Anyway, thank you for your valued opinion that I'm not 'bad', it's a great comfort to me to know that avoiding shallow preconceptions based on looks it actually ok afterall. I can rest easy.