D
Deleted member 1258
Guest
Well, we've really helped the OP here ....
We seem to have gone off on a tangent over the last couple of pages.
Well, we've really helped the OP here ....
There is a difference between the subjective perception of how dangerous it is and the objective evidence. Objectively its no more dangerous than walking and yet very few people would regard walking as dangerous. As for the forum its a collection of subjective anecdotes with people tending to come here to complain/sound off/seek sympathy when something has happened and report all the local reports of accidents that happened to others. As Dave R says, its not representative.
Utter utter bollocks.
To any new members viewing this thread one or two the posts could appear quite alarmist, thankfully there's enough sound advice being given for such members to be re assured.
Why do some cyclists wear black? Red, blue or flouro yes, but surely wearing black is asking for drivers to miss you?
I see Crankarm is doing his best to prove you wrong...I think fear is a sign of intelligence and imagination.
Wearing red is my only concession (apart from a helmet) to safety - and it matches the red part of my red and black bike!
Yeah it's lucky that some of us are giving sound pragmatic advice isn't it? Not everything is rosy is it? How much cycling do you actually do? Perhaps Walsall is a model of manners where every one treats every one else with courtesy and respect?
1800711 said:Unless of course you can do Hi-Viz ironically.
Well my shorts or longs are black, my gloves and shoes and socks predominantly black, my helmet black red and white so yes, black is the background!
As a driver I do think a red or yellow jacket (as long as it's bright and not faded) tends to attract the eye especially from a distance and gives the driver a chance to get used to the idea that there's a cyclist ahead.
I never understood motorcyclists who wear camouflage; that seems like a death wish to me.
Depends where you walk ............ If you were to walk 2-3 foot out in the road it would be flippin' dangerous. If you were to cycle on the pavement on shared use cycle paths all the time it would be pretty safe. You have to compare like with like. Collection of subjective anecdotes ........ that's a new one on me. We have had numerous cyclists literally crucified on here for posting their acounts of being run off the road, dangerous close passes, knocked down, objects thrown at them, etc and you dismiss them as subjective anecdotal postes merely made to complain/sound off/seek sympathy. Either you don't cycle or cycle very little or are an insensitive heartless b*****d or a combination of all three. And do you reach the conclusion it is NOT representative? Were the campaigns that the Guardian, Independent and recently The Times have run on the dangers that cyclists face unrepresentative of cycling?