frank9755
Cyclist
- Location
- West London
But there's still the opportunity afterwards for a shared breakfast.
If you're sharing I suggest you do so with Martin Brice as he doesn't like to eat much after these rides.
But there's still the opportunity afterwards for a shared breakfast.
Okay, I'm convinced. I'll just have to show some self control, when it comes to Saturdayafternoonmorning beers![]()
It's a nice cycle back Ant..![]()
No chance
I'm thinking... brekkie, beer, beer, beer, beer, pootle to station, train...
... I'll just have to show some self control, when it comes to Saturdayafternoonmorning beers. ...
Hmmmm... I'm sure Simon's edited his "no bawdiness" request since I last read it - to remove a double entendre.
I gather this ride is rather longer and stiffer than Brighton, and contains more continuous up-and-down riding. On the other hand it doesn't climax in a stiff peak with a grimace. But there's still the opportunity afterwards for a shared breakfast.
Can't particularly remember anyone apart from myself complaining about Whitstable, although I think the odd person has agreed it is more difficult than some of the others. I think Whitstable is harder for a variety of reasons that are not applicable to other people. I'm not sure what the consensus view would be.
That you are special.
I notice that it has such an effect that you cannot even write about it in such a fashion as to make sense.
Well I'm sure srw will get on fine with it, I never particularly pretended that everyone thought Whitstable was some brutal ride.
Not brutal. Yes, it's rolling, but there's nothing like Portnalls Road or Turners' Hill, let alone the Beacon...
And the last few miles into town make what effort there is all the more worthwhile!