From a scale of 7 to 10 how middle class is this forum?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Tin Pot

Guru
Your "class" (and I really hate the idea of shoehorning individuals into these stereotypes) is a function of your upbringing. It's your upbringing that defines your values and its your values that define your class. By the time you leave school it's set in stone

You can be poor as a church mouse, but if your parents were quite well off and you lived in a nice house and had a "good" education, you cannot be working class because your values are not those of the working class. The opposite is also true. My Dad was a plumber and I was one of the poorest kids in my class at school. I've done alright for myself, but I could never define myself as middle class by dint of my upbringing

Hmm, that’s just a rejection of class or worse it’s saying class is a function of your parents and you can’t change it.

I think the new system that accounts for economics, culture and social is better. Classification can be useful, although labels and pigeon holing are generally destructive.
 

Tin Pot

Guru
Nah! Aristocrats grow beards.;)

I Binged “bearded aristocracy” and got this and thousands of the same, I’m not sure if it supports or denounces your position...

aristocracy.jpg
 

nickyboy

Norven Mankey
Hmm, that’s just a rejection of class or worse it’s saying class is a function of your parents and you can’t change it.

.

Yup, that's exactly what I'm saying. It's got nothing to do with how much money you've got. It's a way of segmenting society based on the values that are held. And these values come, in the main, from your parents, teachers and friends whilst growing up
 

PK99

Legendary Member
Location
SW19
Your "class" (and I really hate the idea of shoehorning individuals into these stereotypes) is a function of your upbringing. It's your upbringing that defines your values and its your values that define your class. By the time you leave school it's set in stone

You can be poor as a church mouse, but if your parents were quite well off and you lived in a nice house and had a "good" education, you cannot be working class because your values are not those of the working class. The opposite is also true. My Dad was a plumber and I was one of the poorest kids in my class at school. I've done alright for myself, but I could never define myself as middle class by dint of my upbringing

Are your kids middle class?
 

PK99

Legendary Member
Location
SW19
[QUOTE 5194238, member: 43827"]I was brought up in a very working class environment. If my young self could see the life I lead now he would definitely describe it as middle class.

[/QUOTE]

Ditto. Parents were (in modern parlance) minimum wage people. Cars, telephones, holidays, meals in restaurants were unattainable things as I was growing up. From the day I went to Uni on full grant, I had more money in my pocket for discretionary spending on "me" than either of my parents ever had.

By income, wealth and lifestyle no one would see me as anything other than Middle Class.

The concepts of Class (Upper/Middle/Working) are, and have been for a long time, pretty irrelevant. They had relevance when mobility between the lifestyles ergo Classes, was very limited. Now, they are essentially meaningless - the Blue collar (working class) White collar (middle class0 distinction long since ceased to mean anything as many traditional Blue Collar/Working class jobs (plumber) pay more than traditional White collar/Middle class jobs (Teacher)

Class is meaningless.
 

Tin Pot

Guru
Ditto. Parents were (in modern parlance) minimum wage people. Cars, telephones, holidays, meals in restaurants were unattainable things as I was growing up. From the day I went to Uni on full grant, I had more money in my pocket for discretionary spending on "me" than either of my parents ever had.

By income, wealth and lifestyle no one would see me as anything other than Middle Class.

The concepts of Class (Upper/Middle/Working) are, and have been for a long time, pretty irrelevant. They had relevance when mobility between the lifestyles ergo Classes, was very limited. Now, they are essentially meaningless - the Blue collar (working class) White collar (middle class0 distinction long since ceased to mean anything as many traditional Blue Collar/Working class jobs (plumber) pay more than traditional White collar/Middle class jobs (Teacher)

Class is meaningless.

Unless you measure it by economic, cultural and social measures. Which they do. Hence the new scheme. And it’s relevance.
 

arch684

Veteran
My father was a miner,my brothers were all miners the only reason i was not a miner was because my father would not let me work down the pit.I could'nt be middle class if i tried
 

PK99

Legendary Member
Location
SW19
Unless you measure it by economic, cultural and social measures. Which they do. Hence the new scheme. And it’s relevance.

But that is not Class, it is Socioeconomic classification ie a descriptor of Education/work/lifestyle not an indicator of group membership and loyalties
 

Tin Pot

Guru
But that is not Class, it is Socioeconomic classification ie a descriptor of Education/work/lifestyle not an indicator of group membership and loyalties

Hmm, I think you forget that upper, middle and lower were the socioeconomic classifications if the past. That’s why they were called classes.

It’s not like I care, I’m just sad that noone’s fighting about it...yet.

wolfie.jpg
 
Top Bottom