Pro Tour Punditry
Guru
And if the ones with guns decided to do some funny business?
The farkers. Right, let's have 6 people in the cockpit.
2 with a gun and another 2 with tigers.
And if the ones with guns decided to do some funny business?
The farkers. Right, let's have 6 people in the cockpit.
2 with a gun and another 2 with tigers.
And a sharpened banana for good measure?
I was on a A320 recently. seats are 3 either side of the aisle. Don't know if that airline has a business section as it's a budget airline, but they are generally curtained off from the rabble in the main part of the cabin after take-off.I don't know, I wasn't there nor am I familiar with the layout of this or other aircraft (not a flyer) as to how visible/audible the pilots actions would be. I'm simply responding to the news reports that have said that the screaming didn't become apparent on the flight recorder until shortly before the impact.
Yebbut, security wouldn't let them through with the guns. Just like they don't let pilots through with more than 100ml of toothpaste, which is a fairly pointless exercise - as this tragedy proves.
The purpose of a second person on the flight deck at all times would be to open the door should the pilot or co pilot refuse to do so.You can put a cabin attendant in the flight deck whilst one pilot takes a break but if the pilot remaining at the controls has malicious intent, it will have zero effect. A competent pilot with malicious intent could have the wings off before you could say "knife".
With 150 people on it, it looks to have been about full or very close to it anyway, so yes, it would have been apparent there was a problem.Either way, the people in the first few rows or people with aisle seats all the way down would have been able to see the captain trying to regain access to his flight deck.
The purpose of a second person on the flight deck at all times would be to open the door should the pilot or co pilot refuse to do so.