As usual, the offence is mostly being taken by those who are fed up with 'all this "women's rights" crap'. It's very telling, both about them and about this forum recently.
You mean the offence at being asked if the term is sexist (presumably those offended are using it), not the being offended by the term granny gear being used by others, correct?
Yes, some posters have taken offence, but I think most have dismissed the idea as ridiculous.
I'm of granny age (50+), have referred to my wee/big combo as granny gear many times, but I've never previously thought about the implication of the term, would be interesting to know how it came first into use.
Maybe when double/compact setups became the norm, if someone considered a triple they would be ridiculed by the bike salesman?
Or there was a time when all dropped top tube frames (women's frames?) had a triple by default?
More cycling semantic investigation is needed!
Before reading this thread I would never have considered the term offensive, simply because I had never heard it used in a belittling way.
I am reconsidering my stance on this one!
EDIT: I thin
@Andrew_P above said the same as me, but he types faster lol
I went to a place near Wales last weekend. We walked up a hill called Lord Hereford's Knob. It was bigger than mine, and I took offence. A group of friends are campaigning for it to be torn down.
Gonna stop derailing an interesting topic?
