tbf the mantra used to be "get a Halfords bike, but get someone competent to build it for you." But if a novice takes that the box of bits to the LBS how do they know the mechanics are competent?This is a great example of the forum bollocks spouters being half believed and the "little knowledge being a dangerous thing." People are quick to condemn Halfords, rubbishing their bikes, their mechanics' abilities and building ability. The mantra repeated over and over again is "get a Halfords bike, but don't let them build it for you." In this instance it has gone horribly wrong. The OP has taken it all to heart and taken the responsibility away from the retailer. Fossy et al are right. I'd build the bike myself, I trust my own abilities more than some LBS mechanics from what I've read on here and other forums, but I'd never advise a novice to assemble a bike. Simple they may be to bolt together, but it takes years of experience to put one together ready to ride safely. I think the Halfords deniers owe the OP an apology. Tough lesson to learn.
As for Halfords, well, I went into the Salford branch for an air fresher last week, and three days later the roof blew off my orangery. Pffffft.
They don't. They let Halfords build it and then they can blame then when they go wrong.tbf the mantra used to be "get a Halfords bike, but get someone competent to build it for you." But if a novice that the box of bits to the LBS how do they know the mechanics are competent?
This is a great example of the forum bollocks spouters being half believed and the "little knowledge being a dangerous thing."
People are quick to condemn Halfords, rubbishing their bikes, their mechanics' abilities and building ability. The mantra repeated over and over again is "get a Halfords bike, but don't let them build it for you." In this instance it has gone horribly wrong. The OP has taken it all to heart and taken the responsibility away from the retailer. Fossy et al are right. I'd build the bike myself, I trust my own abilities more than some LBS mechanics from what I've read on here and other forums, but I'd never advise a novice to assemble a bike. Simple they may be to bolt together, but it takes years of experience to put one together ready to ride safely. I think the Halfords deniers owe the OP an apology. Tough lesson to learn.
As for Halfords, well, I went into the Salford branch for an air fresher last week, and three days later the roof blew off my orangery. Pffffft.
Not only am I agreeing with Halfords, I just "like"d something that @Drago said.
It's 2 signs of the apocalypse!
![]()
If it failed when the OP was going downhill at 20mph, the mech should have been nowhere near the spokes.
Possible causes I can think of:
Sudden failure of the mech hanger.
Sudden failure of the main mech bolt.
Chain failure.
I say the last one because it happened to me. A side plate of a chain link had snapped, but the other side was holding together. I had noticed that shifting had become very noisy and hesitant, but I had assumed it needed a tension adjustment. Eventually the broken plate jammed in the jockey wheel. Luckily I was pedalling very easy at the time and felt it jam. Had I been pedalling hard, it would have ripped the mech off and sent it into the wheel.
Correct, since we can't see the bike, it's just speculation.All that is speculation and would hold no water.
seeing it would not really help in the circumstances!Correct, since we can't see the bike, it's just speculation.
My point is that the OP himself says he should have known better than to buy a Halfords bike. I suspect that is down to the fact that many, many posts come from the start point that Halfords bikes are crap. They aren't. People are quick to condemn Halfords out of hand, which is grossly unfair and not helpful to a novice. Their bikes, at least their high end stuff, are excellent value for money in terms of componentry and bang for buck. He has bought into that and then excuses his choice of bike by saying he was constrained by the C2W.Not sure I'm clear on your point here. Most of the observations you refer to on various threads do advocate having a local expert set up the new bike. And as in this case no one but the o p did the pdi then the threads slagging Halfords for poor technical work aren't relevant?
Bottom line is unless there's paperwork covering the work, why would anyone accept liability? You wouldn't sell a second hand wheelset or whatever and agree to a refund if the buyer couldn't prove it was your fault when they rode into a sheep.
From here it goes all wrong. We don't know why the damage happened, but the OP is convinced it's down to poor quality components. The thing is, without an expert opinion, it could be several things, but it is not an everyday sort of catastrophe. Mechs and mech hangers don't go hurling themselves into the spokes or wrapping round the frame on their own. From Halfords point of view, the "you built it, it's your problem" is an obvious answer. They have offered to split the bill, quite generously. Talk of taking them to small claims are frankly ridiculous.
I'd agree entirely. The fact that I and others have seen a large number of Halfords bikes with some shocking build errors isn't the actual issue here. The common factor is down to mechanical error in building the bike in the first place, and sadly that is the most likely explanation in this case. Whilst a rear dérailleur could in theory have a manufacturing fault, the statistical likelihood of that being the underlying cause of the incident is effectively non existent and on the balance of probabilities, which is what any court would look at, the most likely scenario is down to some error in assembling the bike.
So the fact that Halfords have offered any money is quite remarkable as they're under no legal or moral obligation to do so, so I'd accept the offer and get a replacement bike.