Sorry Cunobelin - usually you talk a lot of sense, this time you appear have descended to the puerile level of argument that you deride in those who suggest wearing fruit on your head in order to head butt a brick wall.
Why can't we all accept that some prefer to wear helmets and some don't ?
This was in response to the proposed experiment that: ...
If you bang your head on a wall - it will hurt
If you bang your head on a wall wearing a helmet it hurts less....
This is supposedly proof that helmets should be worn.
I simply pointed out that wearing a fruit (or vegetable) with a hard shell and soft inner would also hurt less, and ergo by the same standrd of proof proves wearing fruit is beneficial to cyclists.......
Same experiment, same "proof", and the same validity to the results.
In the same way the Thudguard exectly mirrors the helmet debate. Medical endorsement, the emotive blackmail attempts, the endorsement of Road Safety organisations.....
Why shouldn't we give equal consideration to the THudguard?