Joe24 said:
And instead of shooting little rabbits, shot a few cows. Works out much better. He could get alot more meat from one bullit if he shot a cow, compared to if he shot a rabbit.
And he would of probably done the farmer a job, and saved the cow being carried in a lorry along roads to be slaughted.
Why waste time aiming at little fluffy things you can get half a meal from, when you can shoot a big stupid cow and get lots of meals.
Cubist said:
You don't understand. This was the bovine Charles Bronson and Bruce Willis love-child. It was nails. I'm not sure it would have fallen over if he shot it, and you don't want to disappear under acres of turgid udder if you only winged it and made it cross.
You could carry a nice gun, with sights - like the above fella's got, and a rocket launcher.
So the bullet didn't get in any meat, you would probably have to get a head shot. If you didn't manage to get a headshot and hit it in the body instead, you'd know because it probably wouldn't kill it - so you'd have to use the rocket launcher in order to then blast it into the middle of next week if that was the case, in order to be humane and put it out of its suffering from the wound.
The more cows that have to be rocketed, the more it would cost you for your go on the cow range.
In fact thinking about it there would probably be enough people taking up the hobby of shooting cows to not need any other method, and what with the incentive, enough people getting good enough at it to get a probably above 90% yield.