S-Express
Guest
Another explanation of the same 'black magic, wizardry and general heresy' here: https://cyclingtips.com/2009/03/what-is-the-optimal-tyre-pressure/
Realise that in my Post #25 (hope useful) I did not directly answer Q3 (above).How much pressure should I have in the tyres on my hybrid bike when carrying fully laden panniers (for example on my coast to coast cycle?)
You'd have more luck with a brick wall tbh.
Pretty useless article imo. Hunt give no rationale for their recommendations or their front rear split. You can work out your front rear split (help needed) by getting on your bike, putting the (bathroom) scales beneath each wheel in turn, being supported adopt your 'riding position' of choice (eg on the hoods) and reading off the results. The BQ article which I attached in my post #25 gives the 'normal' splits for the different types of rider (randonneur, racing, city).Here's an interesting article from Hunt, which does describe the issue better. https://www.huntbikewheels.com/pages/recommended-tyre-pressures
How's that wall coming on..?
Another article on the same: http://triathlete-europe.competitor.com/2011/05/03/facts-figures-myths-optimum-tyre-pressure
I know they're triathletes, but we can forgive them for now..
I note the forthright activity you have managed to elicit with your 'wall' assertion and shall try that with @S-Express in future. You have done much better than I did in the 'road buzz' thread. Having tossed the 'just google it' your way, he's found some stuff, some useful, some not, and shared it.You'd have more luck with a brick wall tbh.
Credit where credit's due, please.I've no doubt you know your stuff
I've no doubt you know your stuff but your attitude sucks shoot. You talk to people like shoot and you come across just wrong on an internet based forum. I'm yet to have the pleasure to meet you in real life so I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt. 99.9 % positive this isn't your first account on this forum though![]()
and @r04DiE
This article gives some useful arguments (if not data) on which @S-Express may be drawing (albeit with careless phrasing), and I recommend it to you. The main argument is that by running wider tyres at lower pressures you reduce the suspension losses in the rider/bike combo and thus real rolling resistance is reduced. On a smooth drum (ie the rollingresistance.com tests) rollingresistance reduces very slightly as the pressure on the same tyre is increased - but this higher pressure results in more, for want of a better word, 'bouncing' on rough surfaces (eg roads) which actually means a narrower tyre at higher pressure (to avoid pinch flats) is 'slower'. Edit: this may be @S-Express "in many cases' ie not on tracks.
At higher speeds (eg 45+kph) aero aspects may come into play, and wider tyres tend to be heavier (which may be an issue if lots of acceleration involved - as opposed to steady riding). It would be excellent if tyre manufacturers of the good road tyres (Michelin, Continental, Vittoria, Schwalbe et al) made 28s which measured 28 and 32s in the same 'road tyre' range, as opposed to the step across (ie not up) to the fastest but heavier 'touring' tyres eg M Supremes.
They tested 3 CX tyres and none of them were faster at lower pressures , they said they were the same .
Oh yes they are! Common knowledge - just google it.Nobody is saying that tyres are routinely faster at lower pressures though.
Nobody is saying that tyres are routinely faster at lower pressures though.
Oh yes they are! Common knowledge - just google it.
Edit: Depends what you mean by 'routinely' and 'lower'.