So just because GG is new to CC, he can't possibly know anything about cycling then? Perhaps he has been cycling a very long time and doesn't bother with forums (not a bad idea).Dear Granny, I know I only met you five days ago, but here are some eggs. Let me help you with eating them. Kind regards, Garethgas x
I confess I haven't seen much of this "hatred" towards cyclists. I ride secondary most of the time, primary if I need to and 99% of motorists are absolutely fine with it.
I confess I haven't seen much of this "hatred" towards cyclists. I ride secondary most of the time, primary if I need to and 99% of motorists are absolutely fine with it.
If you find my posts patronising, why not make a constructive contribution that may help others less experienced than yourself, instead of pretending that you have some kind of rank here just because you've been here longer?He might know a bit about cycling; he doesn't know much about us. He's as welcome as anyone else who doesn't wade in being patronising. OK Branny?
I think the debate comes from my, for one, not really knowing how often I should pull over to allow overtakes. Every time there's a car behind would be excessive in one direction; the whole (in my case) mile and a half would be excessive in the other direction. I'll bet different cyclists have different opinions.Where's the debate though? This is good practice, so is car drivers showing patience. What it isn't, is 'keeping taking primary to a minimum'.